Hi,
Could you please allow dhcp3 to enter testing?
Thanks
Andrew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Nathanael Nerode schrieb:
Steve Langasek wrote on debian-release:
And glademm build-depends on libbonobouimm1.3-dev. This may be a bug, but
the net result is that there's more here than just unused libraries.
However, glademm also build-depends on libgnomemm-dev, which is uninstallable
This time a reply to all ... sorry
Nathanael Nerode schrieb:
Steve Langasek wrote on debian-release:
And glademm build-depends on libbonobouimm1.3-dev. This may be a bug, but
the net result is that there's more here than just unused libraries.
However, glademm also build-depends on
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 12:11:40AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
However, glademm also build-depends on libgnomemm-dev, which is uninstallable
due (indirectly) to the removal of libpng10-0. The plan according to
debian-gtk-gnome is to remove all the GNOME 1 packages. Most of them depend
on
Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 16:54 +1000, Hamish Moffatt a écrit :
What about the 134 packages that depend on gdk-imlib1? Some of them are
libraries but there are certainly real applications in there too, like
gpredict and gnucash and plenty of others.
Why is libpng10 being removed if it is
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 16:54 +1000, Hamish Moffatt a écrit :
What about the 134 packages that depend on gdk-imlib1? Some of them are
libraries but there are certainly real applications in there too, like
gpredict and
On 2005-09-26 Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:32:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/bin
cd $(dirname $(find -name lamclean -perm +u+x -type f
[...]
Thanks! This is ready for next upload whenever that happens, already
had uploaded /u+x (which appears to be working).
Take care,
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2005-09-26 Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:32:12PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Could you please allow dhcp3 to enter testing?
The current version of dhcp3 in testing is the same as the version in
unstable...?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:35:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:32:12PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Could you please allow dhcp3 to enter testing?
The current version of dhcp3 in testing is the same as the version in
unstable...?
I think Joey hinted it in?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:37:25PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:35:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:32:12PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Could you please allow dhcp3 to enter testing?
The current version of dhcp3 in testing is the
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:42:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:37:25PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:35:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:32:12PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Could you please allow dhcp3
12 matches
Mail list logo
