Re: mpich C++ transition status

2005-10-01 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-30 18:11]: The following packages still need a new upload: Source: r-cran-hdf5 Source: statdataml Just to let you know: I will orphan soon these two packages and will ultimately ask for removal from the archive. This is under discussion in the

Re: mpich C++ transition status

2005-10-01 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:02:13AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: * Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-30 18:11]: The following packages still need a new upload: Source: r-cran-hdf5 Source: statdataml Just to let you know: I will orphan soon these two packages and will

Re: glademm and removing gnome1/c++ libraries

2005-10-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:25:10PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Christof Petig wrote: There is no reason for glademm to build depend on libgnomemm-dev! It simply tests libgnomemm for existance to provide a reasonable default version. Since these days libgnomemm is rarely used (to say the

Re: mpich C++ transition status

2005-10-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Russ, On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 06:11:49PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration. lam is currently building on m68k, after which point hdf5 needs to be requeued on m68k, and then once it builds various other packages will need requeues on m68k