Re: mpich C++ transition status

2005-10-24 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-11 19:22]: Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration. The following are uploaded, but some have build problems: Source: blacs-mpi Source: hdf5 Source: illuminator Source: lam Source: mpb Source: mpich Source: netpipe Source:

Re: mpich C++ transition status

2005-10-24 Thread Russ Allbery
(Please note that I'm currently on vacation and won't have Internet access for another week in about 15 minutes. Just checking in on things while I'm gone.) Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I guess we are getting quite close now (only rmpi on hppa is blocking now) but shouldn't

how to ask for a binNMU?

2005-10-24 Thread Nathanael Nerode
fvwm needs a binNMU on ARM for its own sake; it shouldn't be waiting for libpng, but it is, becaue one of the ARM autobuilders had an old version of libpng12-dev hanging around. How does one suggest such a thing? Likewise gif2png, dillo, ygraph. (libgdk-pixbuf does too, but it's part of GNOME

Suggestions

2005-10-24 Thread Nathanael Nerode
I suggest commenting out the KDE/JACK/unixodbc hint for now, since we know it won't go in for (a) at least two days and (b) until libpng does (barring gobs of binNMUs), and we further know that it won't give useful information until then. Meanwhile, I suggest uncommenting the imlib/libpng hint so

consider allowing mozilla in

2005-10-24 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Mozilla has two RC bugs, but they're both present in the version in 'testing' already. Might as well unclog spidermonkey, epiphany-browser, etc. force mozilla/2:1.7.12-1 -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left blank. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

maxdb hint

2005-10-24 Thread Nathanael Nerode
I'm so pleased, I found an easy one. # Bug #334843 remove php4-maxdb/7.5.00.30-1 easy maxdb-7.5.00/7.5.00.30-3 libdbd-maxdb-perl/7.5.00.32-1 -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left blank. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Suggest removing or binNMUing llvm

2005-10-24 Thread Nathanael Nerode
llvm was compiled with g++ 3.3 on i386, g++-4.0 everywhere else (bug #330638). As such it is sort of an ugly annoyance in the C++ transition. Perhaps a binNMU, or a removal, is appropriate. This mismatch is present in testing as well as unstable since the same version is present in both. --