Re: libstdc++ configuratrion

2005-11-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 12:30:43PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: with these news, i need to understand how boost debian package needs to move. currently unstable has boost 1.33.0, which would be ready for testing if it did not depend on gcc = 4.0.2-3. my understanding is that gcc-4.0, as

Re: libstdc++ configuratrion

2005-11-12 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Matthias Klose wrote: about 150. attached is a list of source packages, which either define mt_alloc symbols or reference them. libraries depending on kdelibs do not have to be renamed (about 30/40). Um, out of curiosity, why don't they? They didn't need to be renamed for 'c2' because KDE had

Re: libstdc++ configuratrion

2005-11-12 Thread Matthias Klose
Nathanael Nerode writes: Matthias Klose wrote: about 150. attached is a list of source packages, which either define mt_alloc symbols or reference them. libraries depending on kdelibs do not have to be renamed (about 30/40). Um, out of curiosity, why don't they? They didn't need to be

module-init-tools to testing

2005-11-12 Thread Marco d'Itri
Please push module-init-tools to testing. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]