Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:35:30PM -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote:
I note that one of the issues with the Sparc port is the the lack of a
developer accessible machine.
At present, vore.debian.org is back on line; the underlying issue, though,
seems to be that vore, like the buildds,
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
I think an Ultra 5 is probably a little light for our purposes: m68k's
porter machine may be slower, but m68k also doesn't have, say, an
openoffice.org port that might need debugging... Also, given the problems
that consumer-grade DSL poses for system
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:12:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:24:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I don't know how much we care about that...
cvm
mailfront
are in testing but Build-Depend on freecdb which isn't.
Well, that's a release-critical bug,
Hi,
some two month ago I requested permission to update f-prot-installer
in stable. Alas, it has never been uploaded, f-prot-installer has been
dysfunctional for quite some time now. Therefore I'd like to repeat my
request. An inter version diff is attached. The actual fix is a one
liner.
I'm
reopen 345868
thanks
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:12:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:24:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I don't know how much we care about that...
cvm
mailfront
are in
Hi,
I uploaded fai (2.8.4sarge1) sarge-proposed-updates; urgency=low. This
contains fixes for three important bugs. Attached is the debdiff to
2.8.4, but most lines in it are just cvs/svn diffs since I moved from
CVS to svn.
I hope that this version will be included into the next point release
I specified a wrong distribution for fai 2.8.4sarge1 in my last
upload. I fixed that and had uploaded fai (2.8.4sarge1) stable; urgency=medium
--
regards Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 04:45:00AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi release team,
gmetadom was built on m68k with ocaml-findlib 1.1-3, which was affected
by 338935. For some reason (buggy upstream makefile, apparently) this
didn't lead to a failed build.
Look for Fatal error: the file install
On Wed, Jan 4, 2006 at 05:24:41 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
BinNMU queued for gmetadom, dep-wait set for gdome2-xslt.
Thanks. lablgtkmathview will need a requeue with the fixed gmetadom,
too (that should be it, there aren't other packages build-depending on
libgdome2-ocaml-dev).
Is there a
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:35:30PM -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote:
I think an Ultra 5 is probably a little light for our purposes:
Vore has a 300Mhz Ultra II CPU, and SCSI disks. An Ultra 5 has an
Ultra IIi between 270Mhz and 440Mhz. The
# needs to go in with binNMU of libtext-chasen-perl
hint chasen/2.3.3-6.2
--
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in
the interest of efficiency.) --Steve Lanagasek,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01056.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
easy trustedqsl/1.11-4 tqsllib/2.0-4
--
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
easy omniorb4/4.0.6-2 python-omniorb2/2.6-2
--
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's just a goddamned piece of paper.
-- President Bush, referring to the US Constitution
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
# pick up binNMUs of sidplay and xmms-sid
hint sidplay-libs/2.1.1-3.1
--
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And they're all separate roots of the tree, none depending on
any other. So the solo hint for wfmath is unlikely to work. Try
hint wfmath/0.3.4-4 atlas-cpp/0.5.98-3 varconf/0.6.3-2
instead.
--
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Such as http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/12/msg00060.html
The c2a transition seems to be under control. A message about the
state of toolchain transitions in unstable follows under separate cover.
--
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's just a goddamned piece of paper.
--
I've stopped paying attention to non-release architectures.
The following package needs to stop being built with g++ 2.95:
xmovie -- bug 321187
(this is a severely broken monstrosity -- maybe I'll suggest to the
maintainer again that he just remove it from unstable)
-- rejected
17 matches
Mail list logo