Re: Please hint zipios++, enigma

2006-02-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:08:46PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > They need to go in together for the C++ allocator transition. > easy zipios++/0.1.5.9+cvs.2004.02.07-3.3 enigma/0.92.3-1 Added, thanks. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Develop

Re: fluidsynth binNMU?

2006-02-14 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 05:11:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:34:59AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I noticed that libfluidsynth1 is uninstallable in sid on m68k due to > > its dependency on libreadline4, which is no longer in sid. It looks > > like a binNMU o

Re: fluidsynth binNMU?

2006-02-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:34:59AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I noticed that libfluidsynth1 is uninstallable in sid on m68k due to > its dependency on libreadline4, which is no longer in sid. It looks > like a binNMU of fluidsynth should fix this? Is that correct? Yes, it should be doable

Please hint zipios++, enigma

2006-02-14 Thread Nathanael Nerode
They need to go in together for the C++ allocator transition. easy zipios++/0.1.5.9+cvs.2004.02.07-3.3 enigma/0.92.3-1 -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in the interest of efficiency.)" --Steve Lanagasek, http://lists.debian.org/debian-de

fluidsynth binNMU?

2006-02-14 Thread Stephen R Marenka
I noticed that libfluidsynth1 is uninstallable in sid on m68k due to its dependency on libreadline4, which is no longer in sid. It looks like a binNMU of fluidsynth should fix this? Is that correct? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAI