Could somebody kick a buildd to binNMU subversion 1.3.0-4 on i386 only?
A well-known bug where we don't cleanse quite all the rpaths suddenly
became a security issue because the last version uploaded on i386 was
built in /tmp, so the two apache modules have built-in rpaths that
would let an attack
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Andi,
>
> On Monday, 27 Mar 2006, you wrote:
>> * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060324 16:00]:
>> > Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for
>> > whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and
Le Lun 27 Mars 2006 22:04, Jordi Pina Estany - Pinucset a écrit :
> Sorry, when I asked when Kaffeine will be in unstable I wanted to say
> Cinelerra.
>
> So, is there any plan to enter Cinelerra in unstable?
there is a lot of /plans/ :
http://bugs.debian.org/78209
http://bugs.debian.org/156614
h
Sorry, when I asked when Kaffeine will be in unstable I wanted to say
Cinelerra.
So, is there any plan to enter Cinelerra in unstable?
Thanks and sorry for the confusion :)
--
Pinucset - Jordi Pina Estany
Mail/Jabber: pinucset[arroba]gmail[punt]com
Manresa, Barcelona
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Jordi Pina Estany - Pinucset wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm here for asking if it's planned to enter Kaffeine in Debian unstable.
>
> Is there somebody working in it?
Errm... Is anything wrong with the current packages?
kaffeinestable0.6-1 alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel
powerp
Hi,
I'm here for asking if it's planned to enter Kaffeine in Debian unstable.
Is there somebody working in it?
Cheers.
--
Pinucset - Jordi Pina Estany
Mail/Jabber: pinucset[arroba]gmail[punt]com
Manresa, Barcelona
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Hi Andi,
On Monday, 27 Mar 2006, you wrote:
> * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060324 16:00]:
> > Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for
> > whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same
> > result.
> >
> > If noone minds we reu
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060324 16:00]:
> Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for
> whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same
> result.
>
> If noone minds we reupload tar with a bumped version number to s-p-u.
Is a bi
8 matches
Mail list logo