Hi,
following the notes from the stable release team meeting on March 14th,
taken by Thijs and delayed and checked by me. Thanks, Thijs for writing
down all of this. Of course, there has been some progress in the last 16
days, so please take this mail as status from March 14th, and not as
from
Some days ago, I mistakenly uploaded version 2.1.73-1 to unstable,
delaying the transition of libhdf5 1.67.5 into testing. In a cumulation
of errors, we noticed yesterday that this version was built against
libhdf5 1.6.4. The fixed version 2.1.73-2 is now in incoming. I deeply
apologize for
Version 7.0.25-5 of flashplugin-nonfree is broken. It cannot be fixed
with minimal changes. Version 7.0.63.1 is reported to work on sarge,
but is very different and very young.
Whoops, I hit send too soon. I also meant to ask if anything can be done
about the insecure version of Flash still
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 09:51:34PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
Hello debian-release@lists.debian.org,
http://www.us.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-upload-stable
It's best practice to speak with the stable release manager before
uploading to
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 05:27 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Again? I wrote a bug about this years ago with a fix. I think is was
just adding --rsh=/usr/bin/rsh to the configure call.
Your patch in response to 185594 added an RSH environment variable
definition to the configure invocation.
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Package: emacs21 (optional; Rob Browning) [emacs21/21.4a-3 ; =] [add/edit
comment]
207932 [ ] [NONFREE-DOC:UNMODIFIABLE] emacs21: Includes non-free
documents
These are not FDL documents, they're just plain unmodifiable documents,
and it's quite clear
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 01:09:20AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
followed by a
bug#465656 fixed, we made the binNMUed
two hours later.
And I'm not interested in having to close such bugs. :)
right, that's kind of superfluous and overkill. however, i still think
it would be nice if at
7 matches
Mail list logo
