On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 05:35:06PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> I'll work on a sarge update w/ the same orig.tar.gz next.
proposed stable update has now been uploaded as well.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:56, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:42:16PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Will the libsysfs1 packages, and especially the udebs, remain
> > available in testing after all regular binaries that depend on it
> > have been rebuilt against libsysfs2?
>
> No,
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:42:16PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:21, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > As discussed on IRC, directfb is tied into the libsysfs ABI transition,
> > so please don't upload before that transition is completed in testing.
> Will the libsysfs1 packages,
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:21, Steve Langasek wrote:
> As discussed on IRC, directfb is tied into the libsysfs ABI transition,
> so please don't upload before that transition is completed in testing.
Will the libsysfs1 packages, and especially the udebs, remain available in
testing after all re
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 04:33:15AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> directfb 0.9.24-1 is now in experimental. Please test it and report any
> problems. I will not move it to unstable for at least a week (plus the
> time RMs may need due to other transitions, etc). I'll send another mail
> just 2 days
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 11:42:02AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Some days ago, I mistakenly uploaded version 2.1.73-1 to unstable,
> delaying the transition of libhdf5 1.67.5 into testing. In a cumulation
> of errors, we noticed yesterday that this version was built against
> libhdf5 1.6.4.
6 matches
Mail list logo
