On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:23:45PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
The more arches are built by the same person, the easier coordination is.
So your offer is very welcome.
Note that you'll need to check out the kernel udeb package sources from
the *sarge branch* of the d-i SVN repo for the
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:15:44PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I seem to remember though that the security update was planned for the end
of Debconf, so I was a bit surprised when reading my mail backlog this
week that it is not out yet.
That was the optimistic plan (I didn't mean to imply
# Clean up leftovers from the X11R7 transition.
#Libice breaks xfwp, which isn't in unstable and comes from the old
#xorg-x11 package, which is going away.
force-hint libice/1:1.0.0-3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 07:41:05PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Martin Schulze wrote:
It would be good if we would be able some day to release kernel
updates in a more timely fashion and also not accumulate this many
security updates in one update. However, due to the number of
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 03:57:32PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
# Clean up leftovers from the X11R7 transition.
#Libice breaks xfwp, which isn't in unstable and comes from the old
#xorg-x11 package, which is going away.
force-hint libice/1:1.0.0-3
Thanks, but this isn't urgent and I'm
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:17:02PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Don't forget to also filter out non-free (or contrib sometimes)
packages that maintainers no longer build, packages that are not for
etch, package that have never been build and
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:23:45PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
The more arches are built by the same person, the easier coordination is.
So your offer is very welcome.
Note that you'll need to check out the kernel udeb package sources from
the *sarge
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:24:46AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
- s390:
- 3.5 developers or so only
This problem is also fixed.
Bastian
--
Lots of people drink from the wrong bottle sometimes.
-- Edith Keeler, The City on the Edge of Forever,
stardate
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:50:17PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:24:46AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
- s390:
- 3.5 developers or so only
This problem is also fixed.
I am curious. How did you fix that ?
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' :
(Removed irrelevant CCs for this question)
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 10:11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If possibly it would be nice to have different mirror lists for sarge
and etch/sid in choose-mirror.
This is not really a problem.
choose-mirror for Sarge will remain unchanged and thus
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:42:23PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Removed irrelevant CCs for this question)
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 10:11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If possibly it would be nice to have different mirror lists for sarge
and
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I ment that when you select sarge in choose-mirror in expert mode you
get the inofficial list and if you choose etch/etch+1/sid you get the
official one.
Might be too much work for a transient problem though.
I thought that installing sarge with
Trading alert!
Just do yourself a favor and watch A B S Y tomorrow morning, and
don't say we didn't tell you...
Talk about flying under the radar? Isn't that what we look for?
Trade Date : Monday, June 7th, 2006
Company Name : AbsoluteSKY
Ticker : A B S Y
Price : $0.95
6month Target : $1 -
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:42:23PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Removed irrelevant CCs for this question)
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 10:11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If possibly it would be nice to have
Hello Debian release team,
gngeo has been removed from unstable, so I expect it should be hinted
for removal from etch as well:
%rmadison gngeo
gngeo |0.6.4-2 | stable/contrib | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386,
ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
gngeo |0.6.7-1 |
Hi Bill,
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:20:56PM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
gngeo has been removed from unstable, so I expect it should be hinted
for removal from etch as well:
%rmadison gngeo
gngeo |0.6.4-2 | stable/contrib | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386,
ia64, m68k, mips,
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:41:16AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:17:02PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Don't forget to also filter out non-free (or contrib sometimes)
packages that maintainers no longer build,
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:59:42AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If using the testing images to install stable is not possible in the
future then we should seriously consider releasing images with newer
kernels in point releases or having D-I on backports.org.
This is being considered
Julien Danjou a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:50:17PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:24:46AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
- s390:
- 3.5 developers or so only
This problem is also fixed.
I am curious. How did you fix that ?
Cheers,
19 matches
Mail list logo
