Aníbal Monsalve Salazar a écrit :
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:09:56AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:50:28PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
What is the current status of nfsv4 in testing.
We are waiting for two packages in NEW, libgssapi and librpcsecgss.
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:33:51PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 08 June 2006 20:08, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:16:57PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known to
> > > have a current backported kernel and all o
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:33:54PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > That said, currently, backports are not an easy solution because of udev,
> > which cannot be taken as is without pulling in the whole gnome, so a bit of
> > work is needed.
> >
>
For people wanting to install Sarge on AMD64 I recommend using the mini.iso
found here:
http://amd64.debian.net/debian-installer/daily/netboot/
I did a sarge jfs on RAID with home on jfs/raid1/lvm with only minor problems
with this iso.
There should be a mention of this iso on the main insta
Hi,
Can usbutils be pushed to testing? It has a udeb.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Can xfsprogs be pushed to testing? It has a udeb.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 03:08:48PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:33:34PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 05:58:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > So despite having been removed from unstable, it still has a
> > > reverse-dependency that block
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That said, currently, backports are not an easy solution because of udev,
> which cannot be taken as is without pulling in the whole gnome, so a bit of
> work is needed.
>
> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
What do you mean? You don't seriously mean udev depends
On Thursday 08 June 2006 20:08, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:16:57PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known to
> > have a current backported kernel and all other packages needed with
> > that kernel, but without random backp
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 08 June 2006 13:33, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > - increasing differences between the Sarge 2.6.8 and current kernels;
>>
>> That is a reason for.
>
> Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known to have
> a current bac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm working on webmin for debian-edu and we have an rather important bug
in webmin for us to fix in debian stable. Would it be possible to fix
#318414 with the attached patch?
debian-edu administration relies on webmin.
Open for comments
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:16:57PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 08 June 2006 13:33, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > - increasing differences between the Sarge 2.6.8 and current kernels;
> >
> > That is a reason for.
>
> Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known
On Thursday 08 June 2006 13:33, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > - increasing differences between the Sarge 2.6.8 and current kernels;
>
> That is a reason for.
Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known to have
a current backported kernel and all other packages needed with
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:33:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What changes are those? Is Debian finaly going to use LABEL= or UUID=
> in the generated fstab?
I hope not; /dev/disk/by-* names seem a lot less kludgy to me.
--
dann frazier
--
To
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:33:34PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 05:58:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > So despite having been removed from unstable, it still has a
> > reverse-dependency that blocks its removal from testing. It'd be great if
> > you could check with t
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Also replying to other mails about Sarge support in Etch installer)
>
> On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:42, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I ment that when you select sarge in choose-mirror in expert mode you
>> get the
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 05:58:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So despite having been removed from unstable, it still has a
> reverse-dependency that blocks its removal from testing. It'd be great if
> you could check with the maintainer to confirm what should really be
> happening here.
The n
(Also replying to other mails about Sarge support in Etch installer)
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:42, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I ment that when you select sarge in choose-mirror in expert mode you
> get the inofficial list and if you choose etch/etch+1/
18 matches
Mail list logo
