* Loïc Minier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060705 21:54]:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Wouldn't that work out something ?
>
> I don't know, will sbuild break dependencies to honor build-conflicts?
IIRC no.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
* Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060702 19:49]:
> The Debian Security Manual does not currently have a section on SELinux,
> it is only mentioned, in passing at the "Adding kernel patches" section [1]
>
> I would gladly add a separate section on SElinux to the Manual if
>
Hi Moritz, hi stable team,
Moritz Muehlenhoff [2006-07-06 0:10 +0200]:
> Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > > > a vulnerability of it's own or a fix required to cope with behaviour
> > > > > changes due to the new escaping against the big5 injection attacks?
> > > > > The latter on
I'm bringing this to d-release to have more comments on what is best to do.
Please keep CCs, original thread at
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bluetooth-maintainers/2006-July/000361.html
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 12:34:48AM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> > > allright, this looks lik
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Is 2) only an issue of users of testing/unstable, or also of stable?
> Anyways, this seems the least worse to me also, but I'm a bit
> disconneted right now, so perhaps wait for other people's input as well.
I'm not sure on how you imagine
* Loïc Minier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060706 14:48]:
> Solution 2 is just one of the way to achieve the sub-goal, and should
> only take something like 10 days, the time to build python-gnome-extras
> on all arches at least once, then it can be reverted.
That's ok.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 00:35 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> as LSB 3.1 compatibility is one of the pet release goals for etch, it
> would be nice to have some overview of what still needs to be fixed in
> etch for LSB 3.1 compatibility. Could you please rerun the test-suite on
> current etch or
On 2006-06-11 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006-06-06 Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:04:09PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>>> Would it be ok for me to upload this?
>> /me puts his SRMa hat on
>> That's ok, the patch is pretty cl
* Andreas Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060706 19:21]:
> Perhaps the list of packages in sarge-proposed-updates' queue could be
> made visible by http like queue/NEW? Or are security updates uploaded
> there *before* the DSA is released?
Actually, the discussion prior to the change was that the res
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:47:02PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Is 2) only an issue of users of testing/unstable, or also of stable?
> > Anyways, this seems the least worse to me also, but I'm a bit
> > disconneted right now, so perhaps wait for other
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It affects stable in the sense that there are packages in sarge which depend
> on python-gnome2 expecting this to provide the various -extras interfaces.
> So yes, this is a "stable" issue, and just dropping the dependency would be
> a problem for etch
11 matches
Mail list logo
