* Daniel Schepler [Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:57:20 -0400]:
Hi Daniel,
> I just realized I forgot to set today's uploads of kdegames and kdeedu to
> urgency=medium. Is there something you could do to correct this without my
> having to upload new packages just for this?
Since these upload are new up
reassign 342545 qt-x11-free
thanks
please make sure, that qt-x11-free is built using g++-4.1 on hppa. The
binary packages still depend on libgcc2 in some way.
Note, that (before the release) we need to rebuild all binaries
depending on libgcc2 on hppa, so that the dependency is replaced by
libgcc
Frans Pop wrote:
> Reason is that libcairo still depends on -24 and thus d-i builds currently
> fail as that version is no longer available.
> Also, this means that the new directfb has to migrate to testing before we
> can release d-i, which in turn means that all packages that depend on
> dire
I just realized I forgot to set today's uploads of kdegames and kdeedu to
urgency=medium. Is there something you could do to correct this without my
having to upload new packages just for this?
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 08:07:27PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> i forgot to tell that iproute acts in those cases as looping cpu hog.
> thus severity might well be serious.
I think so.
However, for now I'll stay on my position because of the kernel related
reason. If a kernel from backports.o
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, maximilian attems wrote:
> iproute should work with higher Debian kernels as the ones provided
> on backports.org.
> fedora/rh don't compile atm as modules and are thus not affected.
i forgot to tell that iproute acts in those cases as looping cpu hog.
thus severity might wel
hello julien,
> The severity is not actually considered critical,
> and the fix is quite "ugly".
the fix is taken from upstream branch and should be distributed in
unstable.
> Furthermore, if I understand correctly, it only appears with kernel >=
> 2.6.8, which is the one furnished by Debian wit
On Saturday 29 July 2006 16:01, Frans Pop wrote:
> You uploaded a new upstream version of directfb a few days ago (or
> rather, it was accepted a few days ago), and I'm afraid that looks
> likely to completely mess up the Beta 3 release plans for the
> installer.
The alternative is to release Beta
Hi Guillem,
I do not want to blame you or anything, but I do need your help to get
things sorted out.
You uploaded a new upstream version of directfb a few days ago (or rather,
it was accepted a few days ago), and I'm afraid that looks likely to
completely mess up the Beta 3 release plans for
Hi,
currently, Debian etch still contains a package of exim 3, an outdated
version of our Default MTA which is still in wide use, but has been
unsupported by upstream for years. Even its maintainer has stopped
using it in the mean time, so exim 3 users _really_ _really_ should
upgrade.
Unfortunat
10 matches
Mail list logo
