In linux.debian.kernel Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What can be done about this?
Accept that most people do not consider this a problem?
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2006-07-31 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 10:36:24AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2006-07-20 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:02:49AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
Could you please schedule
Can someone please schedule the following binNMU to fix #381272?
wanna-build -b alpha/build-db -d unstable --binNMU 1 -m Rebuild against
libgii1 heroes_0.21-6
wanna-build -b amd64/build-db -d unstable --binNMU 1 -m Rebuild against
libgii1 heroes_0.21-6
wanna-build -b arm/build-db -d unstable
In linux.debian.kernel Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What can be done about this?
Accept that most people do not consider this a problem?
First of all, this is false. Most Debian developers agree with me. You
think not? Prove it by proposing a GR. More importantly, the release
On 2006-08-03 Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
In which form would I need to provide NMU requests to generate as
little work for you as possible?
[...]
gsasl (amd64 and s390 +b1, all archs except s390 need a rebuild.)
---
wanna-build -b
* Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) [060730 15:10]:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 12:56:26PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Florian Weimer stated[4] that the only approach known to work is
static keys for stable releases and stable security updates.
For stable updates, an off-site key would
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 12:46:09PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Hi,
as stated in [0], waldi is working on an oot-module conglomeration
package to solve NEW spamming for oot-module packages when the kernel
ABI is bumped.
My take is that there should be no step taken to solve the NEW spamming
7 matches
Mail list logo
