On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:49:33PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, it reads to me that we won't screw our users without second
thought like some here are proposing.
In my opinion, we have been screwing our users for years by lying to
them
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) either move the individual affected drivers or just their firmware if
possible to non-free, and keep the cripled kernel in main.
This is certainly the last resort, in my opinion, but it isn't
crippled. Merely not supporting particular pieces of
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
4) pass a GR explaining the issue as is, and admitting our
incapacity to fix it with 2 or 3 due to lack of ressources.
We do not need a GR to simply follow our existing procedures.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:57:36AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) either move the individual affected drivers or just their firmware if
possible to non-free, and keep the cripled kernel in main.
This is certainly the last resort, in my
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:58:33AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
4) pass a GR explaining the issue as is, and admitting our
incapacity to fix it with 2 or 3 due to lack of ressources.
We do not need a GR to simply follow our existing
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:58:33AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
4) pass a GR explaining the issue as is, and admitting our
incapacity to fix it with 2 or 3 due to lack of ressources.
We do not need a
Hello, developers. I have seen that linux-ntfs 1.13.1 is not advancing
to
testing due to the freeze. I thought that fjp was looking into it. We ran
into problems with 1.13.1 (see #379628), but in fact it turned out to be a
problem in how the partition size is chosen (size units,
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 12:17, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
Hello, developers. I have seen that linux-ntfs 1.13.1 is not
advancing to testing due to the freeze. I thought that fjp was looking
into it. We ran into problems with 1.13.1 (see #379628), but in fact
it turned out to be
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:01:33AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nope, the issue only surfaced early after the sarge release, a bit
less than a year ago, when the new kernel team formed.
It was discussed *before* sarge was released that there was
Scores in that thread:
who how many
--
A. Spragg 1
A. Thornton1
B. Gerardo 1
D. Dickinson 1
F. Schueler1
G. Danchev 1
G. von Brederlow 4
J.
Hello.
In order not to repeat sarge mistakes, I have a simple question for
the release managers: Am I in time to upload gettext 0.15?
This is the upstream NEWS file:
===
Version 0.15 - July 2006
* GUI program support:
- PO
Hallo,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:02:42AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
We can simply take our time to do (2). It is the job of a package
maintainer to check the licenses of their software; if the kernel team
cannot do so by December, even with help, I don't mind waiting.
then, please,
Hello,
libgnomesu 0.9.5-3 initialy FTBFS to temporary uninstallable
build-depends and when vorlon re-scheduled on july 31st it suffered
the same fate as the directfb transition temporarily wreaked havoc.
Please rerescedule it. Thanks.
cu and- release goal: Only one version of gnutls in etch
Hi there release team,
I have made a few (minor) improvements to cron that I would like to squeeze
into before base is frozen. Attached is the .changes file of the package I
have ready to upload. Unlike the gettext one (Santiago's) I don't intend
to do an update to the latest upstream, but it's
On 08/02/06 22:17, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Start with drivers/char/drm/mga_ucode.h. This is distributable, because it's
under
a BSD license, but it's not free software, because there's no source code.
There is no source code, because there never was any source code.
What do you think
I apologize for responding to Marco's post; in retrospect he was clearly
trolling and I should not have responded to him.
The point of my initial message was not to argue: it was that the etch
timeline is unrealistic, because I see no progress on removing the
substantial number of sourceless
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:05:22PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Hello,
libgnomesu 0.9.5-3 initialy FTBFS to temporary uninstallable
build-depends and when vorlon re-scheduled on july 31st it suffered
the same fate as the directfb transition temporarily wreaked havoc.
Please rerescedule it.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:46:35PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2006-07-31 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 10:36:24AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2006-07-20 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:02:49AM +0200, Andreas
18 matches
Mail list logo
