On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 03:27:19PM +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
The new upstream version of evolution-data-server, 2.6.3, creates a
library package with soname change. libegroupwise1.2-10 is replaced by
libegroupwise1.2-12. The only rdepends outside of the source package
is evolution, which is
Hi
Can someone please schedule binNMUs for
rquantlib_0.2.3-1, Rebuild against libquantlib-0.3.13, 1, !hppa, !m68k
P-a-s for m68k, hppa should be Dep-Wait gcc-4.0 = 4.0.3-6 or something
like that (gcc-4.0 FTBFS on hppa, but has Arch:all packages...)
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes -
Hi
Can someone please schedule binNMUs for
bogofilter_1.0.3-1, Rebuild against libqdbm14, 1, !arm
not yet build on arm...
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
signature.asc
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 11:29:44PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I apologize for responding to Marco's post; in retrospect he was clearly
trolling and I should not have responded to him.
The point of my initial message was not to argue: it was that the etch
timeline is unrealistic, because
On 10/08/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 03:27:19PM +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
The new upstream version of evolution-data-server, 2.6.3, creates a
library package with soname change. libegroupwise1.2-10 is replaced by
libegroupwise1.2-12. The only
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
[snip]
http://wiki.debian.org/KernelFirmwareLicensing is grossly out-of-date, but I
will integrate the relevant information from that in the process.
KernelFirmwareLicensing is supposed to track information about
mis-licensed firmware. IIRC you mentioned to have found at
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 02:48:08PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And even for an aggregation of works the DFSG holds and you are still
in trouble.
Sure, the DFSG says that we need the source code for those, and
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 04:32:52PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 02:48:08PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And even for an aggregation of works the DFSG holds and you are still
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 11:08:34AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:54:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 20 Jun 2006, Colin Watson verbalised:
It's dual-licensed upstream; I contacted upstream years ago about
this issue (before it became particularly public that
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 04:32:52PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not familiar enough with how library are run, but there is some very
different way in which libraries called by programs work, and the way
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 06:14:08PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where people buy their hardware or how free their hardware is has
little to do with Debian main. It is a problem for the linux upostream
authors to support the hardware with free
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please don't lose track of the fact that there's nothing inherently wrong
with a sourceless binary if that's all the source anyone *has*.
I think in most of the cases under consideration, we have firmware
which a hardware manufacturer wrote and then
On 2006-08-10 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:05:22PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
libgnomesu 0.9.5-3 initialy FTBFS to temporary uninstallable
build-depends and when vorlon re-scheduled on july 31st it suffered
the same fate as the directfb transition
Hi,
i'm referring to Andreas Barths post to debian-devel-announce and
specifically the following list of packages:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~he/base-freeze-packages
Looking at this is noticed some packages which are priority 'important'
at the moment but this doesn't seem right any more:
14 matches
Mail list logo