Re: please don't remove skkdic

Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: Hi, Frank and the release team, On August 6, 2006 at 3:08PM -0600, noreply (at henning.makholm.net) wrote: HINTED FOR REMOVAL: skkdic 20040323-1.1 http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/djpig # lets get this moving, #272127 This moving

Re: please don't remove skkdic

On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 02:02:00AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Hi, Frank and the release team, On August 6, 2006 at 3:08PM -0600, noreply (at henning.makholm.net) wrote: HINTED FOR REMOVAL: skkdic 20040323-1.1 http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/djpig # lets get

Re: flashplugin-nonfree broken in sarge

Hi Bill, About this old thread on debian-release: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/03/msg00170.html You wrote on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:42:01 -0600 on debian-release: I would suggest to provide a 7.0.25 version with an updated /etc/update-flashplugin.conf.rb that point to a fixed

RoM: binNMU subversion?

subversion in sid needs a recompile now that python 2.4 is here. Can someone trigger a binNMU on all architectures? It doesn't seem worth the trouble to source-upload, and a binNMU for new python _should_ be safe. BTW, Andi - thanks for pushing the neon transition through the other day. Peter

More tasn1-2 binNMUs

Hello, now that libgnomesu has been built and uploaded on ARM further binNMUs to get rid of gnutls11/libtasn1-2 can be triggered. gst-editor_0.8.0-1, rebuilt against gnutls13, 1, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc cupsys-pt_1.2.4-3,

Re: udeb support for britney

(as discussed on IRC, CC'ing debian-release as others should be able to comment; please reply to the list) Hi Fabio, First of all, thanks for contacting me on this and nice that this subject is getting attention. Note that my knowledge of the archive scripts and procedures is limited, so