Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
we should finally agree on which kernel version we want to release etch
with, and on an appropriate timeframe.
The goal should be obvious: release Etch on December, 4th.
All kernel team members I asked so far would prefer a release with
2.6.18, which is
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 13:05 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
libxml++2.6-1c2a was renamed to libxml++2.6-2, the following source
packages would need a bin NMU:
synfigstudio
There will be a regular upload of this soon, just need to get one of my
DD co-maintainers to do it.
--
bye,
pabs
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:25:58AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
That's currently the domain of the BTS. Anyone could publish sufficient
security (RC bugs) in a vulnerable package that it would make it impossible
for it to be released. Of course that would only be possible if:
That
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:07:42AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maks -
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:05:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
Something about [bug #242866] seems broken, however,
because RC-buggy linux-2.6 packages keep making it into
testing. Is it obvious how to keep
keep me out of this thread.
enough time is lost with any of those dfsg firmware wankers,
that do _zero_ work upstream or on the licensing front.
the drivers are free not-fucking non-free.
rest in peace
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
5 matches
Mail list logo