Re: Kernel schedule proposal for Etch

2006-08-17 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Frederik Schueler wrote: Hello, we should finally agree on which kernel version we want to release etch with, and on an appropriate timeframe. The goal should be obvious: release Etch on December, 4th. All kernel team members I asked so far would prefer a release with 2.6.18, which is

Re: bin NMUs for libxml++2.6 transition

2006-08-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 13:05 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: libxml++2.6-1c2a was renamed to libxml++2.6-2, the following source packages would need a bin NMU: synfigstudio There will be a regular upload of this soon, just need to get one of my DD co-maintainers to do it. -- bye, pabs

Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Removing insecure packages from etch

2006-08-17 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:25:58AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: That's currently the domain of the BTS. Anyone could publish sufficient security (RC bugs) in a vulnerable package that it would make it impossible for it to be released. Of course that would only be possible if: That

Re: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware

2006-08-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:07:42AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maks - On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:05:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: Something about [bug #242866] seems broken, however, because RC-buggy linux-2.6 packages keep making it into testing. Is it obvious how to keep

Re: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware

2006-08-17 Thread maximilian attems
keep me out of this thread. enough time is lost with any of those dfsg firmware wankers, that do _zero_ work upstream or on the licensing front. the drivers are free not-fucking non-free. rest in peace -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.