Re: Re: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware

No, what allowed sarge to go out the door with DFSG violations was an unambigous GR by a majority of the debian developers who decided to include those non-free firmware (and GFDL docs, and some random fonts, and ...), into sarge even though they didn't quite meet the DFSG. That vote is not

gcj and etch freeze

Hi! Any chance gcj = 4.1.1-11j1 can make it into etch? Would be very nice to have gcjwebplugin-4.1. We'll have no browser java support otherwise. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to

Re: gcj and etch freeze

On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:54:39PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Any chance gcj = 4.1.1-11j1 can make it into etch? gcj-4.1 hasn't been frozen yet, but whether this gets into etch depends on when it's uploaded. Would be very nice to have gcjwebplugin-4.1. We'll have no browser java support

Re: Request for binNMUs for the libxml++2.6 transition

On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:45:09AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Can someone please schedule binNMUs for: wormux_0.7.3-1, Rebuild against libxml++2.6-2, 1, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc gnomoradio_0.15.1-5, Rebuild against libxml++2.6-2, 2, alpha,

Re: Please hint colo 1.22-1

On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:16:55PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Can someone pleaes review and approve colo 1.22-1. It fixes a FTBFS bug. Hinted. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can

Re: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware

Sven Luther wrote: On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:07:42AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maks - On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:05:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: Something about [bug #242866] seems broken, however, because RC-buggy linux-2.6 packages keep making it into testing. Is