Re: Xen is affected by the trademark desease

On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:14:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > XenSource published a trademark policy[1]. I don't think we will be able > to follow it if we want to support installation of different versions at > the same time. > [1]: http://www.xensource.com/company/legal.html >From this page

Repackaging for loop-aes: split between debs and udebs

Hi all, As you know there is currently a problem with loop-aes as the 2.6.17 debs are wanted in testing to go with the current kernel, but they are blocked by the udebs from the same source package which should stay at 2.6.16 because of D-I Beta1. Max has been working on repackaging so the ude

Re: [Build-common-hackers] Re: cdbs update

Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le sam 30 septembre 2006 10:16, Peter Eisentraut a écrit : > > * Move dh_installinit to binary-fixup to make sure its postinst > > fragment is the last (debhelper.mk) (closes: 386970) > > AIUI that would break deamons using dh_pysupport. This is exactly to fix daemons us

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#390664: closed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Theodore Y. Ts'o) (Bug#390664: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1)]

Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would appreciate any comments from the Debian Release Managers and > Debian Masters about whether or not it is required to remove any files > which are legal for us to redistribute (such as RFC's and I-D's), but > which are not DFSG-compliant from sourc

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#390664: closed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Theodore Y. Ts'o) (Bug#390664: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1)]

* Theodore Tso ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061003 21:19]: > I would appreciate any comments from the Debian Release Managers and > Debian Masters about whether or not it is required to remove any files > which are legal for us to redistribute (such as RFC's and I-D's), but > which are not DFSG-compliant f

Re: Xen is affected by the trademark desease

On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:14:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks > > XenSource published a trademark policy[1]. I don't think we will be able > to follow it if we want to support installation of different versions at > the same time. What about renaming it zen ? Mik

Re: cdbs update

Le mar 3 octobre 2006 17:19, Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > Le sam 30 septembre 2006 10:16, Peter Eisentraut a écrit : > > * Move dh_installinit to binary-fixup to make sure its postinst > > fragment is the last (debhelper.mk) (closes: 386970) > > AIUI that would break deamons using dh_pysupport. t

Xen is affected by the trademark desease

Hi folks XenSource published a trademark policy[1]. I don't think we will be able to follow it if we want to support installation of different versions at the same time. Bastian [1]: http://www.xensource.com/company/legal.html -- There are some things worth dying for. -- Kirk,

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#390664: closed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Theodore Y. Ts'o) (Bug#390664: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1)]

I would appreciate any comments from the Debian Release Managers and Debian Masters about whether or not it is required to remove any files which are legal for us to redistribute (such as RFC's and I-D's), but which are not DFSG-compliant from source tarballs (but which are not included in any of p

Re: intent to do a poppler transition

Ondřej Surý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 22:39 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote: >> Dear Ondrej! >> >> Can you now tell us what the status is? It is a bit unclear for me? I >> can create new packages for texlive-bin with the changed patch, or leave >> it. >> >> Are the package

Re: cdbs update

Le sam 30 septembre 2006 10:16, Peter Eisentraut a écrit : > * Move dh_installinit to binary-fixup to make sure its postinst > fragment is the last (debhelper.mk) (closes: 386970) AIUI that would break deamons using dh_pysupport. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O

Re: cdbs update

Hi, On Sat, Sep 30, 2006, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > * Move dh_installinit to binary-fixup to make sure its postinst fragment > is the last (debhelper.mk) (closes: 386970) I second this change: I've just discovered that flumotion is started before its Python files are compiled. I'

Re: hardinfo status.

tags 385781 moreinfo thanks On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:19:57AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 02:38:17PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > >0.3.7pre-4, however, did build on alpha, arm, ia64, m68k and s390, and the > > >corresponding binaries are still in unstable. The maint

Re: Would an ABI change of apt for DDTP support still be accepted?

On Mon, October 2, 2006 19:15, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: >> Best translated are required/important/standard, but those descriptions >> will be the least relevant to Joe Average, since these packages are >> already installed for him. > > The goal should be making sure that most of the packages p

Re: intent to do a poppler transition

On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 22:39 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote: > Dear Ondrej! > > Can you now tell us what the status is? It is a bit unclear for me? I > can create new packages for texlive-bin with the changed patch, or leave > it. > > Are the packages you want to upload to unstable already in exper

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Remove some architectures for vzctl]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:55:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 04:51:44PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > The response from the following bug #390637 was that I need to > > inform the release team and request the removal by them. > > That response is incorrect. You'r