-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:46:50 +0200,
Frans Pop wrote:
> [1 ]
> On Monday 23 October 2006 16:19, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > And please allow ttf-cjk-compact-udeb also:
> >
> > unblock ttf-cjk-compact/1.7
>
> At this stage of the RC1 release process I'd ver
Fabian,
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:49:15AM -0700, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:26:02 +0300
> Source: cyrus-sasl-2.1
> Binary: libsasl2-2 cyrus-sasl-2.1-bin libsasl2 libsasl2-2-dev sasl2-bin
> libsasl2-dev libsasl2-2-modules-gssapi-mit libsasl2-modules-gssapi-
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:34:59AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Please push the new netbase and openbsd-inetd in testing, they implement
> the new *inetd architecture which was discussed on debian-devel last
> month.
unblock netbase/4.27
unblock openbsd-inetd/0.20050402-3
Done.
Cheers,
--
Ste
On Monday 23 October 2006 16:19, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> And please allow ttf-cjk-compact-udeb also:
>
> unblock ttf-cjk-compact/1.7
At this stage of the RC1 release process I'd very much prefer if this
request were accompanied by a statement that the new version of the udeb
has been tested with th
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 09:25, Per Olofsson wrote:
> pcmcia-cs-udeb shouldn't even be used at all by the installer. It
> doesn't work with current kernels. I should have removed this package
> as well. Frans, is this correct?
It is maybe not actively used, but still supported. So we'd prefer
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 23:25, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Please find enclosed a more targeted patch that brings the
> SELinux code in openssh to compatibility with the current SELinux
> code shipped in Debian.
[...]
>http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/packages/pool/o/openssh/
Loo
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:41:50PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I've noticed that user tags for debian-release@lists.debian.org went
> missing yesterday, try the 'Status page in the BTS' link on:
> http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation
> This link used to contain the bugs t
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061025 21:32]:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> - The problems mentioned later in #327616 by Andreas Hoehnen, the fact
> >> that the PS documentation cannot be created, is not an issue: cdbs
> >> does not want to create PS documenta
I've noticed that user tags for debian-release@lists.debian.org went
missing yesterday, try the 'Status page in the BTS' link on:
http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation
This link used to contain the bugs that were tagged as containing
non-free documentation.
Was this done inte
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> - The problems mentioned later in #327616 by Andreas Hoehnen, the fact
>> that the PS documentation cannot be created, is not an issue: cdbs
>> does not want to create PS documentation. Moreover, the error is
>> small, well-known and easy
Hi,
is there anybody who can tell me, where I find on the internet the
images for the floppy/network-intallation?
Michael Hardtmann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> this is the situation:
>
> - db2latex-xsl is RC buggy, dead upstream and should be superceded by
> dblatex
OK.
> - There is only one dependency on it left in the archive (sarge, sid and
> testing[1]), and this is cdbs
OK.
> - cdbs can build it
tags 393665 patch
thanks
Hi,
this is the situation:
- db2latex-xsl is RC buggy, dead upstream and should be superceded by
dblatex
- There is only one dependency on it left in the archive (sarge, sid and
testing[1]), and this is cdbs
- cdbs can build its documentation with dblatex as well.
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:58:21AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> So, from the other thread, seems like the idea for m68k is:
>>
>>(a) keep building unstable as per usual
A per architecture tracking of arch:all package would be ni
Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:11:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > Assumed m68k would be able to kill (most of) the backlog in time, what
>> > would
>> > prevent m68k from becoming releasable?
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ncurses 5.5-3 is in testing, and 5.5-5 fixed a serious bug (conflicting
> symlinks in /usr/share/doc). 5.5-4 only added a cosmetic change for
> Architecture in control (addition of ppc64).
>
> Please hint ncurses-5.5-5 into testing, thanks.
Done.
Marc
Hi,
just a small reminder that etch still has no 64bit kernels for
i386. This is a regression from sarge which has them. The bug
(#379090) has a simple patch to reintroduce those kernel images (+5/-1
lines code change and the rest is config) for nearly 100 days without
a comment so far.
Would it
Hi,
ncurses 5.5-3 is in testing, and 5.5-5 fixed a serious bug (conflicting
symlinks in /usr/share/doc). 5.5-4 only added a cosmetic change for
Architecture in control (addition of ppc64).
Please hint ncurses-5.5-5 into testing, thanks.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgun
Steve Langasek:
> It's frozen because all packages which build udebs are perpetually "frozen"
> (requiring hand-approval by the release team).
pcmcia-cs-udeb shouldn't even be used at all by the installer. It
doesn't work with current kernels. I should have removed this package
as well. Frans, is
19 matches
Mail list logo
