On Saturday 11 November 2006 11:36, Christian Perrier wrote:
> iso-codes features a few l10n updates to ISO-3166. The package is
> currently blocked because it provides a udeb but the content of that
> udeb will not change and therefore, allowing the package to testing
> does not affect D-I.
I don
reopen 340709
thanks
On Sunday 12 November 2006 22:39, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 06:34:18PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > I'm not quite sure why #340709 (don't release RC marker bug) is marked
> > as resolved.
>
> Because you marked it as resolved with the message:
>
>
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> iso-codes features a few l10n updates to ISO-3166. The package is
> currently blocked because it provides a udeb but the content of that
> udeb will not change and therefore, allowing the package to testing
> does not affect D-I.
Has there been any
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 07:25:39PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
> I did not feel confortable asking for removal because the package
> still has a not-so-low popcount (~145 installed, ~40 vote).
>
However, since it was last uploaded two years ago and is unmaintained
upstream for over
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:50:41PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 12:27:04PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > Package zinf:
> >
> > * Had last maintainer upload 2 years ago.
> > * Has been RFAd for over a year. http://bugs.debian.org/328956
> > * According t
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:32:10PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> please consider hinting ltsp 0.99debian7 into etch, which is
> (presumably) held up by the ltsp-client-builder udeb.
Hinted.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
please consider hinting ltsp 0.99debian7 into etch, which is
(presumably) held up by the ltsp-client-builder udeb.
it contains documentation updates, translation updates, security
improvements, and additional configurability options that make it more
useful.
thanks yet again!
live well,
vagran
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 06:34:18PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> I'm not quite sure why #340709 (don't release RC marker bug) is marked as
> resolved.
Because you marked it as resolved with the message:
After discussions with Alan (upstream), we've agreed that rapple *can* be
let into t
Hi,
* Petter Reinholdtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061021 15:48]:
> As you probably are aware, only part of my work on sysvinit made it
> into Etch. I am still not sure if I should request an exception from
> the release team to get an updated version into Etch or not. On one
> hand, I would like t
* Roberto C. Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061112 19:50]:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 12:27:04PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > Package zinf:
> >
> > * Had last maintainer upload 2 years ago.
> > * Has been RFAd for over a year. http://bugs.debian.org/328956
> > * According to RFA, it i
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 12:27:04PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> Package zinf:
>
> * Had last maintainer upload 2 years ago.
> * Has been RFAd for over a year. http://bugs.debian.org/328956
> * According to RFA, it is unmaintained upstream and has alternatives.
> * Is rc-buggy: http:/
* Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061112 19:45]:
> Package zinf:
>
> * Had last maintainer upload 2 years ago.
> * Has been RFAd for over a year. http://bugs.debian.org/328956
> * According to RFA, it is unmaintained upstream and has alternatives.
> * Is rc-buggy: http://bugs.debia
Package zinf:
* Had last maintainer upload 2 years ago.
* Has been RFAd for over a year. http://bugs.debian.org/328956
* According to RFA, it is unmaintained upstream and has alternatives.
* Is rc-buggy: http://bugs.debian.org/397032
Thus, I believe it should be removed from etch.
Please cc: I'm
Yo!
I'm not quite sure why #340709 (don't release RC marker bug) is marked as
resolved. I tried to reopen it with a "found" command because I don't
think it should be shipped with etch but then didn't follow up. I've just
now seen that the bug is not open and rapple is still in testing.
chee
14 matches
Mail list logo
