On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:16:46PM +0200, Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(...)
It seems this source package contains the following files from the
IETF under non-free license terms:
xulrunner-1.8.0.7/directory/c-sdk/ldap/docs/draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-05.txt
Hi there, RMs and super-heroes of the kind...
I was asked to sponsor an upload of libcrypt-gpg-perl.
The current maintainer, Matt Hope [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a bit MIA, and
has been unresponsive about our ITNMU pings. His last upload of
libcrypt-gpg-perl was in July 2003.
This upload is a new
Laurence J. Lane wrote:
Hi Release Team,
Hi Laurence
A couple of regressions occurred with iptables. They're both set at
severity normal, but I believe they are important.
The bug reported as 397712 broke the rename-chain command line option.
It was fixed upstream and is in
Hello,
As already mentioned, parted 1.7.1-3 fixes a RC bug, which makes the parted
frontend be totally unusable inside d-i, and possibly also elsewhere.
This means, it is not possible anymore to resort to command line parted to
workaround problems in partman, and thus it is urgent that the fixed
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 12:33:11PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
As already mentioned, parted 1.7.1-3 fixes a RC bug, which makes the parted
frontend be totally unusable inside d-i, and possibly also elsewhere.
This means, it is not possible anymore to resort to command line parted to
workaround
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:08:14AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:16:46PM +0200, Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(...)
It seems this source package contains the following files from the
IETF under non-free license terms:
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 12:26:54PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
Hi there, RMs and super-heroes of the kind...
I was asked to sponsor an upload of libcrypt-gpg-perl.
The current maintainer, Matt Hope [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a bit MIA, and
has been unresponsive about our ITNMU pings. His last upload of
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 03:54:21PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
I would like to update bluefish and docbook-xsl with it's latest
releases.
bluefish: version in Debian is 1.0.6, but 1.0.7 was released soon after
we released 1.0.6 to fix a few bugs. It's really just a bug-fix
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
Um, gnome-devel is an important reverse-dependency. We can't just drop
the meta-gnome2 package from etch if bluefish ends up broken, after all.
If need be, you can NMU meta-gnome2 (arch: all) via TPU, or in
unstable, without notice and drop
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 11:08:25AM +, Daniel Glassey wrote:
Greetings,
I am requesting permission to upload new packages to unstable for the
sword source package.
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/sword
The only binary packages that depend on this are gnomesword and
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 07:05:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Currently lilypond 2.8.7 is in unstable. It is blocked waiting for its
own timelimit and for guile-1.8 to finish building on other archs and
migrate itself.
Well, it's waiting for more than just guile-1.8 to finish building,
Hello release-team (and all the others),
the upstream author of mcabber made a bugfix-release for mcabber extra
to go into etch. It contains some bugfixes, the one about UTF-8 i think
is important: http://www.lilotux.net/~mikael/mcabber/files/ChangeLog
May I ask my sponsor to upload my package
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 06:33:03PM -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On 11/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am wondering if this bug should be considered RC, as it makes
lsb_release unable to report that is is running etch:
lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are
Hi Steve,
Am Sonntag, den 19.11.2006, 04:37 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 03:54:21PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
I would like to update bluefish and docbook-xsl with it's latest
releases.
bluefish: version in Debian is 1.0.6, but 1.0.7 was released soon after
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 04:13:29AM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Mike,
Does your question apply to *all* of the files mentioned in the mail you
linked to? I don't understand which files you believe are non-free and why;
some of the files mentioned are things like
On 2006-11-19 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
severity 399362 important
thanks
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 02:37:36PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Package: imapproxy
Version: 1.2.4-5.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.4, shell scripts specifying /bin/sh as interpreter
must
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 05:38 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 07:05:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Currently lilypond 2.8.7 is in unstable. It is blocked waiting for its
own timelimit and for guile-1.8 to finish building on other archs and
migrate itself.
17 matches
Mail list logo
