Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
Hello,
Could you please unlock planet 2.0-6 for etch? It renames
/usr/bin/planet to /usr/bin/planetplanet due to name conflict with
drscheme (already in stable and testing).
Unblocked.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Rene Engelhard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
please unblock bcm43xx-fwcutter. Diff from 1:005-1 to 1:005-2:
please also unblock myspell. Following trivial change was done. Although not
release-critical
nor otherwise important (yet), it's totally riskless.
Both
Sergio Talens-Oliag wrote:
I've uploaded a new version of childsplay-alphabet-sounds-ru and
childsplay-alphabet-sounds-sv, the original tarballs are packaged diferently
from the rest of childsplay-alphabet-sounds-XX packages and the current etch
packages install the sound files on the wrong place
Torsten Werner wrote:
Hello,
the package has been accepted for unstable right before the freeze.
After some arm build problems it is now ready for etch and there are
no bugs. May you accept the package for the etch release, please?
I'm not keen of adding new packages in a freeze...
Cheers
L
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Hi, here's a list of changes I've recently made to some of my packages and
would like to see them go through the freeze (after they have spent some time
bug-free in sid, of course):
- acidbase (1.27-2): uploaded a week ago fixing important bug #402868 (will
Hello,
Could you please unlock planet 2.0-6 for etch? It renames
/usr/bin/planet to /usr/bin/planetplanet due to name conflict with
drscheme (already in stable and testing).
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
pgpzIzYw6CvDo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:44:07PM -0800, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
> Hence there is currently *no way* to upgrade Sarge -> Etch without the
> package manager insisting to remove the running kernel package!
>
Ouch.
> Possible fixes:
>
> 1) Fix #395181 so initrd-tools can get back into Etch
> 2)
Hi release team and initrd-tools maintainer,
One issue that seems problematic for people currently upgrading from
Sarge to Etch is that there is currently no initrd-tools package in
Etch. (I guess it's been removed because of #395181 and/or #393092. Why
can't #395181 just be fixed already?)
The
On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 00:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> An explicitely stated goal of the release team was to reduce the
> number of supported python versions for the next stable release. We
> did include three python versions for sarge (2.[123]). To reduce that
> count we do have to drop 2.3 (
On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 00:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> To conclude, the support of multiple python versions is not meant at
> all as an excuse for lazy debian maintainers depending on python for
> not following upstream python development.
Are you calling me lazy for not fixing a bug that you
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:38:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> An explicitely stated goal of the release team was to reduce the
> number of supported python versions for the next stable release. We
> did include three python versions for sarge (2.[123]).
Actually, four: 2.4 is also in sarge (ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
please unblock bcm43xx-fwcutter. Diff from 1:005-1 to 1:005-2:
diff -u bcm43xx-fwcutter-005/debian/po/de.po
bcm43xx-fwcutter-005/debian/po/de.po
- --- bcm43xx-fwcutter-005/debian/po/de.po
+++ bcm43xx-fwcutter-005/debian/po/de.po
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @
Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 19:51 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:17:03AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > The python team has apparently decreed that python 2.3 will not be in
> > > etch. This forces every package to use the new version.
There are only translation updates.
Thanks, and Merry Christmas!
Andrew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> What about users who are depending on Python 2.3? Do they just lose?
> It seems to me that for things like this, our releases should always
> have the next-oldest version as an option for those users.
They can continue to use Sarge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
I've uploaded a new version of childsplay-alphabet-sounds-ru and
childsplay-alphabet-sounds-sv, the original tarballs are packaged diferently
from the rest of childsplay-alphabet-sounds-XX packages and the current etch
packages install the sound files on the wrong place.
The new packages install t
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 19:51 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:17:03AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > The python team has apparently decreed that python 2.3 will not be in
> > etch. This forces every package to use the new version. Surely it is
> > too late in the re
Am Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 15:22 schrieben Sie:
> I'm not really happy to approve this package, there are a lot of changes
> to debian/patches/01-defaults.dpatch which are not document in the
> changelog. Please either remove them or explain them in the changelog of
> a new upload.
I remove
Hello,
the package has been accepted for unstable right before the freeze.
After some arm build problems it is now ready for etch and there are
no bugs. May you accept the package for the etch release, please?
Thanks,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner4
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:32:30AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 15:46 +, Alex Owen wrote:
>
> > This patch should fix the problem. I guess the opotions are to aply
> > this patch to 1.16 or package 1.16.1. I guess applying the patch is
> > the better option if we wnat to
Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> I suggest to include cogito 0.18.2-1 into etch. It's 12 days in
> sid now, and adds a missing dependency, rated as important bug #400100.
>
> Similar for git-core 1:1.4.4.2-1, it's 8 of 10 days old now, fixes FTBFS
> on m68k, important bug #402022. An autobuild at
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> yesterday, I uploaded ircmarkers 0.12-1 to unstable. The diff is fairly small,
> and I'd like to request the inclusion of that version in testing.
Unblocked.
Marc
--
BOFH #49:
Bogon emissions
pgpA0PfrwiSy2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
yesterday, I uploaded ircmarkers 0.12-1 to unstable. The diff is fairly small,
and I'd like to request the inclusion of that version in testing.
The --help output mixed up latitude and longitude, and because of that a user
triggered a segfault that was caused by all markers being outside of t
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Cameron Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A new version of the TorrentFlux package has been uploaded and it is now
RC-free. As TorrentFlux was removed from testing on Dec. 1st, I am now
requesting it be re-added. The new version (2.1-7) only fixes the security
relate
On 12/20/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
New version reviewed and hinted. Luk, can you drop your hint for the old
version?
Thanks, Steve.
Cheers,
Shaun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cameron Dale wrote:
Andreas Barth wrote:
- If your package has been removed recently (i.e. in the last 20 days)
due to an RC bug, and you have an bugfix-only update uploaded,
you can contact the release team about letting your package back in.
Same as above: Do not expect us to fin
Cameron Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A new version of the TorrentFlux package has been uploaded and it is now
> RC-free. As TorrentFlux was removed from testing on Dec. 1st, I am now
> requesting it be re-added. The new version (2.1-7) only fixes the security
> related issues found in the pre
Goedson Teixeira Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please hint gnomebaker 0.6.0-6 (debdiff to 0.6.0-1 attached) for
> inclusion in Etch. It fixes bugs 399880,399225, 398364 and 401104. It
> also fixes a potential memory corruption in 64 architectures that has
> not been reported.
Unblocked.
Ma
Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 15:46 +, Alex Owen wrote:
>> This patch should fix the problem. I guess the opotions are to aply
>> this patch to 1.16 or package 1.16.1. I guess applying the patch is
>> the better option if we wnat to fix this for etch.
> It's n
"Mark Purcell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given the discussion has died down.
>
> I am proposing to release digikam[imageplugins] 0.8.2 to unstable in the
> next couple of days to overcome the lack of an libexiv2 transition.
From what I can see, this is fine. bugs.d.o doesn't report anything
un
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:58:27PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But madison is not available currently and brute-forcing the Packages
> > seems rather awkward, especially when a single SQL query would do the
> > trick.
>
> madison is availab
Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just NMUed simpledb fixing #403059, could be unblocked?
Unblocked.
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
153: höflich
Abwesenheit von absichtlichen Beleidigungen. (Lars Marowsky-Brée)
pgpmaKFUzRkfJ.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
Arnaud Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you please unlock netenv 0.94.3-21 for etch? It fixes typo in the
> debconf template and it updates the german translation too.
Unblocked.
Marc
--
BOFH #236:
Fanout dropping voltage too much, try cutting some of those little
traces
pgp51o79j
Rudy Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a short review of chillispot status and why I ask for
> including the latest revision.
Unblocked.
Marc
--
BOFH #101:
Collapsed Backbone
pgpR2uv0aTmQL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Christian Welzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please accept the fixed package
> typo3-src_4.0.2+debian-2.dsc
> which was already uploaded into testing-proposed-updates.
Approved.
> Please also accept the changed package
> typo3-dummy_4.0.2-3.dsc
> which adds some security enhancements to the typ
Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Two of the lsb build tool packages, lsb-build-cc2 & lsb-build-cc3, have
> been uploaded with fixes for #403739. This bug was creating a situation
> which was preventing these packages from flowing into testing due to
> unsolvable dependencies.
Both unb
Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As discussed yesterday on #debian-release channel, we were missing
> support for the LSB Desktop module in lsb-build-base3. This fix has been
> uploaded now. The fix involves creating a new "leaf" binary package,
> lsb-build-desktop3, which contains the
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please include the new version (now in unstable) for etch.
> The changes:
> - update and correct documentation
> - update and correct defaults in configuration file
> - correct debian/copyright files
> - add dependency: Conflict: lxr-cvs
Unblock
Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The transitional 'postgresql' package got one cosmetic change (package
> description improvement) and its testing waiting time is over. Can we
> please put this into Etch?
Unblocked.
Marc
--
BOFH #192:
runaway cat on system.
pgpsg9pE9zmNg.pgp
Descripti
Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the clanbomber version in sid has a patch for fixing FTBFS on machines
> which have a soundcard, but do not support particular sampling rates
> (see bug #398855). The patch does not touch anything concerning
> runtime at all, just the code that builds the d
Héctor García Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This latest version fixes RC ##401791 and another RC bug which was never
> reported (the first one masked this latest).
Unblocked.
Marc
--
BOFH #104:
backup tape overwritten with copy of system manager's favourite CD
pgpNWHLoBw8G5.pgp
Descrip
Arjan Oosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could haskell-uulib 0.9.2-6 be unblocked? It fixes a FTFBS (#403091) due
> to a missing build dependency. The diff is below.
Unblocked.
Marc
--
BOFH #54:
Evil dogs hypnotized the night shift
pgpOSnhBGil2d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But madison is not available currently and brute-forcing the Packages
> seems rather awkward, especially when a single SQL query would do the
> trick.
madison is available for you. You have access to ftp-master, where the
projectb is (naturally) up-to-d
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:22:31AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 06:35:48PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > Etch is frozen but some architectures have been ignored for testing
> > propagation in the past.
>
> > 1) is there a convenient way to get the list of source pac
On Thursday 21 December 2006 12:01, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes, TTBOMK these packages could be binNMUed for a *silent* ABI change.
> For an ABI change expressed in the package name, they would all need
> sourceful uploads.
For d-i release management I'd actually prefer an ABI change for loop-aes
Hi,
Could haskell-uulib 0.9.2-6 be unblocked? It fixes a FTFBS (#403091) due
to a missing build dependency. The diff is below.
Greetings Arjan
diff -u haskell-uulib-0.9.2/debian/changelog
haskell-uulib-0.9.2/debian/changelog
--- haskell-uulib-0.9.2/debian/changelog
+++ haskell-uulib-0.9.2/debia
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-21 03:01]:
> If the kernel team has decided to push forward with the ABI changes
> (I don't know if this is the case, I haven't seen much response to
> my message on-list?), it would certainly be better to get started on
> this sooner rather than later.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 06:35:48PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Etch is frozen but some architectures have been ignored for testing
> propagation in the past.
> 1) is there a convenient way to get the list of source packages that lack
> binary packages for some architectures in Etch but that i
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:10:05PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Sorry to disturb, but now I have made a new version that I have uploaded
> to testing-proposed-updates. The reason for that is that I will soon
> upload a new version to unstable as well.
Thanks, I've approved the version in t-p-u.
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > The first two ABI changes are specific to extra kernel flavors that
> > aren't relevant to the installer and have few (if any?) extra modules
> > built for them.
> Actually, quite a few modules packages are being built for the
> vse
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:33:47PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> this version includes a documentation fix (README.Debian,
> NEWS.Debian). The documentation mentioned a feature that we
> decided to postpone until after etch; It would be great if
> you could let this version into testing.
Approved.
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:01:23PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Dear release team,
>
>> I have just uploaded this package to unstable. It inherits urgency=high
>> from -4, you might want to give it more time, see below.
>
> Reviewed and hinted. Andi,
tags 403611 etch-ignore
thanks
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 06:32:20AM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
> On December 18, 2006 at 2:09PM +0100,
> peter_e (at gmx.net) wrote:
> > Package: xemacs21-basesupport
> > Version: 2006.05.10-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: release criterion 5.(e)
> >
Hi,
This latest version fixes RC ##401791 and another RC bug which was never
reported (the first one masked this latest).
Kind regards,
Héctor
P.S.: Congrats on the great work you are doing
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:01:23PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Dear release team,
> I have just uploaded this package to unstable. It inherits urgency=high
> from -4, you might want to give it more time, see below.
Reviewed and hinted. Andi, please drop your hint for -4.
--
Steve Langasek
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:23:11PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 10:31:12PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Based on the bug log, I guess fvwm will continue to be usable in iso8859-1
> > locales, which is roughly the case today anyway, and the added patch will
> > also get
Hi,
please consider upgrade to 0.1.14-beta-6 as it solves the problem that it
should be started before / stoped after postfix (+ fixing upgrade path) and
removed DNSBL of ordb.org from default config (see
http://www.ordb.org/news/?id=38).
The diff against the version in testing is attached.
T
Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently kdebase 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-3 and kdepim 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-3 are
> unblocked, could you update the unblock?
Reviewed, done.
Marc
--
BOFH #253:
We've run out of licenses
pgp47o6lsz2E8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Joey Hess wrote:
This new version of debconf fixes an RC bug that affects the graphical
installer. Or it destroys all systems on the planet. Up to you to
decide. We've tested it in d-i and in an aptitude upgrade.
There's also some translation updates, and quite a lot of the kind of
gratuitious p
59 matches
Mail list logo
