On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:06:23PM +0100, Christian Welzel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 15:22 schrieben Sie:
> > I'm not really happy to approve this package, there are a lot of changes
> > to debian/patches/01-defaults.dpatch which are not document in the
> > changelog. Please either
Dear release team,
I would like to request pango-libthai 0.1.6-3 to be migrated to etch.
The changes, as described in its changelog below, are trivial fixes to
a couple of bugs quite visible to users. No reference to bug numbers
here because it's from a discussion via personal mails with pango
up
A Google search for "debian upgrade reports" (no quotes) returns a page
[0] that is out of date since it is a template for a woody -> sarge
upgrade. I would like to recommend that it either be updated or
replaced with a redirection to a more current page (if one such page
does exist).
Regards,
-
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Wookey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here is mail from upstream about minor patch to fix uninstallability
> > of survex-aven on hppa. I assume this is OK to upload via unstable,
> > and with urgency high? I have the package
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:46:42AM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> please consider upgrade to 0.1.14-beta-6 as it solves the problem that it
> should be started before / stoped after postfix (+ fixing upgrade path) and
> removed DNSBL of ordb.org from default config (see
> http://www.ordb.org/news/?
Neil McGovern wrote:
> typo3-src - unfreeze
> 4.0.2+debian-2 to 4.0.4+debian-1
> CVE-2006-6690 - arbitrary command execution
Nope, 4.0.2+debian-2 was uploaded to testing to fix this.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTEC
I've just uploaded 1.12.13-6 to unstable. Several translation updates
bloat the attached diff (sorry!), but the main point is to fix 2
recently-filed serious bugs: #402745, #403334.
Thanks,
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Because heaters aren't
[debian-release: Read this if you care about the details. The executive
summary is to note that openssh 1:4.3p2-8 corrects an RC bug and should
be hinted into testing if its five days expire without any new RC bugs;
also that all other packages that have had to deal with moving conffiles
between pa
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 10:23:44PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > According to
> > http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=setpwc, m68k and
> > s390 have them set to not-for-us. You have to contact the buildd admins
> > via [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get it cleared. I cleared the state for
On 2006-12-23 11:28 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> hi everybody
>
> (I am CCing this in d-arm .)
>
> 'mplayer' 1.0~rc1-10 was correctly built on ARM but the upload from
> 'smackdown' was rejected . See
> http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=mplayer
> and the attached message.
>
> (It seems that this
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 10:23:44PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> According to
> http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=setpwc, m68k and
> s390 have them set to not-for-us. You have to contact the buildd admins
> via [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get it cleared. I cleared the state for
> s390.
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:56:06PM +0100, Anders Lennartsson wrote:
> And I must say that the buildd:s are really quick. Within 6 hours all
> but m68k and s390 have successfully built the new package, according
> to the logs at http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=setpwc
> The two missing ones have
My sponsor has uploaded a new build of setpwc, 1.1-4.
There is no difference in the source between 1.1-3 which is already in
testing and the new package. The only difference is that the package
now has architecture set to any, compared to i386 and amd64 in
1.1-3. This closes #402724.
And I must s
* Noah Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 19:41]:
> Our options would seem to be to revise the release notes
> to no longer suggest upgrading aptitude before dist-upgrade, or
> including an initrd-tools package that doesn't conflict with current
> libc6. I believe we should include an initrd-to
Please accept bwm-ng 0.5-4 into testing, a patch was included in the last
upload that fixes #403099. The patch is quite minimal and the bug makes
bwm-ng read ~/.bwm-ng.con instead of the expected (and documented)
~/.bwm-ng.conf
It also corrects a small typo in the example configuration file that I
* Vagrant Cascadian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061223 01:23]:
> greetings. i am preparing an upload of ltsp to fix several important
> bugs, and wanted to ensure that all the planned changes would be
> acceptable for etch.
Under the assumption that you have tested all changes, yes.
Cheers,
Andi
--
It appears that currently sysklogd 1.4.1-18 is in Etch. However, on 18
September [0], -19 was uploaded. The upload message shows urgency low,
which is in conflict with [1], which shows that -19 has urgency high. I
am wondering:
a) which is correct?
b) should -19 not be migrated (though -20 is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 09:48:38PM +0100, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
>> I've finished a new upstream version of OpenLDAP. This has 3 binaries:
>> slapd, libldap2.3-0 and ldap-utils. This version is merely to fix
>> important bugs
Hi all,
Could I please have the following:
gaim - priority bump
1:2.0.0+beta5-8 to 1:2.0.0+beta5-9
no CVE ID yet, crash when receiving an invalid UPnP response
libarchive - unfreeze
1.2.53-2 to 1.3.1-1
CVE-2006-5680 - DoS (CPU consumption)
nexuiz - unfreeze/bump
hi everybody
(I am CCing this in d-arm .)
'mplayer' 1.0~rc1-10 was correctly built on ARM but the upload from
'smackdown' was rejected . See
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=mplayer
and the attached message.
(It seems that this is a recurrent problem: see
http://wiki.debian.org/ArmBuilddWatc
20 matches
Mail list logo
