Re: Please unblock wu-ftpd 2.6.2-25

Quoting Nicolas François ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Dear release team, > > Please unblock wu-ftpd 2.6.2-25. > > It fixes some translations (de, eu, ja), and a typo. > Unfortunately, some old PO files were added (*.po~), but that should not > be a problem. I CC wu-ftpd's maintainer in case he wants to

Please *do not* unblock dtc for testing

I'm not in the position to check whether such request could come some day and if the package is currently in testing, but please do not unblock the dtc package for testing in case this would be requested. This version introduces a great number of debconf templates which wording is questionable. It

Please unblock ssmtp 2.61-11.1

Dear release team, I have just uploaded a NMU of ssmtp, to fix its pending l10n issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Could you consider hinting it to enter testing? The NMU changelog is: Source: ssmtp Version: 2.61-11.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Christian Perri

Re: Bug#413686: Bug#413469: ion3: The package is outdated

On 2007-03-07 19:54 -0500, Clint Adams wrote: > This would mean that any sarge users upgrading to etch would be stuck > at ion3 20050502 instead of 20061223. Is that preferable to > allowing fresh installs to have ion3? Yes: at least there won't be new users with ancient releases. -- Tuomo -

Re: Request for permission to upload nufw through t-p-u for l10n and debconf QA purposes

> > no problem; for nufw, you're talking about a total revamp of the debconf > > templates, which isn't something I'm going to accept without maintainer > > input. > > > Whether or not this is a total revamp can be discussed. > > What is done is the following: I have a ready update for t-p-u w

Re: Request for permission to upload sl-modem through t-p-u for l10n purposes

> > Indeed, a complete update of translations in testing should have > > copied the Japanese and French translations from unstable to make > > testing translations as complete as possible. > > Do I have a way to know about them if there are no bug reports? > http://ddtp.debian.net/s.html does not

Please unblock zabbix 1.1.6-2

hi, it would be great to have zabbix 1.1.6 shipped with etch. 1.1.6-1 has been in unstable for about 25 days and seems to work quite well (and fixes some annoying upstream bugs). 1.1.6-2 fixes an important bug regarding ucf and config file creation. Besides that mostly Translation updates. zab

Re: etch: git-core 1:1.4.4.4-2 through t-p-u

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:44:28PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote: > Hi, I suggest to fix bug #413629 in etch with version 1:1.4.4.4-2. sid > already has git-core 1:1.5.0.x, so it needs to go through t-p-u. etch > currently has 1:1.4.4.4-1, debdiff is attached, is uploading ok with > you? Please uploa

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:09:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:44:05AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: I've attached a patch which implements persistent device names in partman by checking for devices which are mounted under /target and which have a suitable link in /de

Re: Please unblock policycoreutils/1.32-3

On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:05:07 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > The only change I find in the uploaded package, aside from the > pruning of the arch metadata (which is welcome, though it makes > reviewing this particular interdiff painful), is to the changelog. > Am I overlooking s

Could sdic 2.1.3-12 be unblocked?

Dear release team, While reviewing sdic (no l10n changes), I found the following changes, which could deserve an unblock: (There are also some changes in POT or PO files, but no string changes) diff -u sdic-2.1.3/debian/control sdic-2.1.3/debian/control --- sdic-2.1.3/debian/control +++ sdic-2.

Re: Bug#413686: Bug#413469: ion3: The package is outdated

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:52:16PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > Upstream of the ion window manager doesn't want to have a development > version in a stable release. > > Please remove the packages ion3, ion3-scripts and ion3-mod-ionflux > from etch. This would mean that any sarge users upgra

Please unblock wmsun 1.03-22

Dear release team, Please unblock wmsun 1.03-22 In addition to l10n stuff, if fixes the Dependencies (debconf and ucf are moved from Recommends to Depends, which must be correct), changes the description, and bumps the Standards-Version. Kind Regards, -- Nekral -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Could sendpage 0.9.14.dfsg-0.2 be unblocked?

Dear release team, Here is sendpage (0.9.14.dfsg-0.2) changelog: * Non-maintainer upload to fix longstanding l10n issues * Remove debconf templates that are completely useless and abuse This "closes" the translation updates Closes: #333715, #345529 This also fixes the debconf

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:44:05AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: > >initramfs-tools already supports using /dev/disk/by-* entries in fstab. As > >for the installer, I'm not sure that looking at Ubuntu will help since > >they use something different than d-i for the regular installs (and I > >don't k

Re: Please unblock freepops 0.0.99-2+patches20061018

Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please unblock freepops 0.0.99-2+patches20061018. Unblocked. Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 29: ... bei der Gestaltung unseres Angebotes selbstverständlich die bestehenden nationalen Bestimmungen und Besonderheiten berücks

Re: Please unblock wu-ftpd 2.6.2-25

Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please unblock wu-ftpd 2.6.2-25. Unblocked, even though the german translation of the templates is crap. Marc -- BOFH #171: NOTICE: alloc: /dev/null: filesystem full pgpEVzEKT3vOn.pgp Description: PGP signature

Please unblock freepops 0.0.99-2+patches20061018

Dear release team, Please unblock freepops 0.0.99-2+patches20061018. It adds a German translation. There is also an undocumented change to debian/rules, but it lloks safe to me: --- freepops-0.0.99.orig/Makefile +++ freepops-0.0.99/Makefile @@ -72,9 +72,8 @@ fi;\ done

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:18:19PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: On Wed, March 7, 2007 13:55, Otavio Salvador said: I don't know how invasive those changes might be. AFAIK Ubuntu already does it (Colin?) and wouldn't be too hard to pick the changes from them but we would also need RM and Frans ap

Please unblock wu-ftpd 2.6.2-25

Dear release team, Please unblock wu-ftpd 2.6.2-25. It fixes some translations (de, eu, ja), and a typo. Unfortunately, some old PO files were added (*.po~), but that should not be a problem. I CC wu-ftpd's maintainer in case he wants to fix this in a later upload. Here is the debdiff's diffstat

Re: Please unblock desktop-base/4.0.1

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:37:31AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Package: desktop-base > > Architecture: all > > -Recommends: epiphany-browser | konqueror | www-browser > > +Depends: librsvg2-common > That was me in r70 of the debian-desktop SVN; I

Re: Please unblock xtell 2.10.5

Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please unblock xtell 2.10.5. > > It adds a Portuguese translation, and a Build-Depends on po-debconf > (debconf-updatepo is used in the clean target) Unblocked. Marc -- BOFH #278: The Dilithium Cyrstals need to be rotated. pgpYloKXUF0KC.pgp Descr

Re: Please unblock slay 2.6.1

Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please unblock slay 2.6.1. Unblocked. Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 147: Fortran Makrosprache für ein I/O-Verhinderungssystem (Arno Eigenwillig) pgp7CE3DQZ93r.pgp Description: PGP signature

Please unblock xtell 2.10.5

Dear release team, Please unblock xtell 2.10.5. It adds a Portuguese translation, and a Build-Depends on po-debconf (debconf-updatepo is used in the clean target) (a comment is also removed from the rules makefile). Kind Regards, -- Nekral -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Please unblock slay 2.6.1

Dear release team, Please unblock slay 2.6.1. It adds a Portuguese translation, and moves debhelper from Build-Depends-Indep to Build-Depends. (Standards-Version is also bumped to 3.7.2 and the maintainer fixed his name). Kind Regards, -- Nekral -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please unblock cmap-adobe-korea1 0+20020208-5.1

Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have just uploaded a NMU of cmap-adobe-korea1, to fix its pending l10n > issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Unblocked. Marc -- BOFH #284: Electrons on a bender pgpnnvTajyxrG.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Please unblock cmap-adobe-gb1 0+20030802-5.1

Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have just uploaded a NMU of cmap-adobe-gb1, to fix its pending l10n > issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Unblocked. Marc -- BOFH #69: knot in cables caused data stream to become twisted and kinked pgpGjyD2XxqCd.pgp Description: PGP

Re: Please unblock cmap-adobe-cns1 0+20040609-4.1

Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have just uploaded a NMU of cmap-adobe-cns1, to fix its pending l10n > issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Unblocked. Marc -- BOFH #404: Sysadmin accidentally destroyed pager with a large hammer. pgprZvFKvgjNg.pgp Description: PGP si

Re: Please accept alsa-lib and alsa-driver

Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > alsa-lib 1.0.13-2 and alsa-driver 1.0.13-5 were uploaded a week ago with > some bugfixes targetted at etch. Both unblocked. Marc -- BOFH #215: High nuclear activity in your area. pgpMG0M2OYyyv.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Please unblock yiff 2.14.5-2.1

Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have just uploaded a NMU of yiff, to fix its pending l10n > issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Unblocked. Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 45: IRQ Internet Relay Quak (Peter Berlich) pgpUy5KHCktWO.pgp Des

Re: Please unblock qpsmtpd 0.32-6

Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please unblock qpsmtpd 0.32-6. > It is 16 days old and only contain a updated Czech translation. Unblocked. Marc -- BOFH #17: fat electrons in the lines pgp02ec5JeKls.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Please unblock php-json-ext 1.2.1-3.1

Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:07:12AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >> Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > I have just uploaded a NMU of php-json-ext, to fix its pending l10n >> > issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). >> Unb

Please unblock qpsmtpd 0.32-6

Dear release team, Please unblock qpsmtpd 0.32-6. It is 16 days old and only contain a updated Czech translation. Kind Regards, -- Nekral -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please unblock php-json-ext 1.2.1-3.1

Hello, On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:07:12AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have just uploaded a NMU of php-json-ext, to fix its pending l10n > > issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). > > Unblocked. A 1.2.1-3.2 was uploaded in the

Re: Bug#413661: libblkid1: leaks memory like crazy

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:36:00PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:05:38PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > No strong opinion either way; I'm more concerned that the e2fsprogs upload > > happens sooner rather than later, so that d-i RC2 doesn't get held up > > waiting for it

Please unblock yiff 2.14.5-2.1

Dear release team, I have just uploaded a NMU of yiff, to fix its pending l10n issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Could you consider hinting it to enter testing? The NMU changelog is: Source: yiff Version: 2.14.5-2.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Christian Perrie

Re: Bug#413269: Wordpress in etch

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:46:29PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > Security Team, > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:27:00PM +, Kai Hendry wrote: > > > As micah suggests I will offer a "firm commitment to actually making > > > the security updated packages when the hol

nis 3.17-5

Please consider nis 3.17-5 for inclusion in testing. It contains no code changes: nis (3.17-5) unstable; urgency=low * Add Dutch translation of the Debconf templates, kindly provided by Bart Cornelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (closes: #413893, #413898). * Add X-Vcs-Bzr to the control file. -

Re: Bug#413469: ion3: The package is outdated

Hi Norbert, On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:52:16PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * tuomov wrote: > > The package is outdated: please remove or upgrade, and keep > > upgrading even after release of the new static (“stable”) Debian. > > See fo

Please accept alsa-lib and alsa-driver

Hi! alsa-lib 1.0.13-2 and alsa-driver 1.0.13-5 were uploaded a week ago with some bugfixes targetted at etch. Please consider unblocking both. Thanks! Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.

Re: please permit upload of new kernel-patch-exec-shield

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:53:41PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote: > The exec-shield patch in testing (2.6.18-2) broke with the recent kernel > update. I have prepared a fixed version, 2.6.18-3. > I cannot upload it to unstable since there is already a version 2.6.20-2 > there. Can I upload it to te

Re: Please unblock gforge 4.5.14-22

Roland Mas wrote: > Roland Mas, 2007-03-07 20:02:53 +0100 : > >> Luk Claes, 2007-03-07 19:55:14 +0100 : >> >>> This revision introduces the following directory which I assume >>> shouldn't be included? If so, please remove it in a new upload. >> Shoot, you're right. I'll build and upload -22 righ

Please unblock cmap-adobe-cns1 0+20040609-4.1

Dear release team, I have just uploaded a NMU of cmap-adobe-cns1, to fix its pending l10n issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Could you consider hinting it to enter testing? The NMU changelog is: Source: cmap-adobe-cns1 Version: 0+20040609-4.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Ma

Please unblock cmap-adobe-gb1 0+20030802-5.1

Dear release team, I have just uploaded a NMU of cmap-adobe-gb1, to fix its pending l10n issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Could you consider hinting it to enter testing? The NMU changelog is: Source: cmap-adobe-gb1 Version: 0+20030802-5.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Main

Please unblock cmap-adobe-korea1 0+20020208-5.1

Dear release team, I have just uploaded a NMU of cmap-adobe-korea1, to fix its pending l10n issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Could you consider hinting it to enter testing? The NMU changelog is: Source: cmap-adobe-korea1 Version: 0+20020208-5.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: lo

Please unblock gforge 4.5.14-22

Roland Mas, 2007-03-07 20:02:53 +0100 : > Luk Claes, 2007-03-07 19:55:14 +0100 : > >> This revision introduces the following directory which I assume >> shouldn't be included? If so, please remove it in a new upload. > > Shoot, you're right. I'll build and upload -22 right away. Sorry > about th

Re: Freeze exception for systemimager 3.6.3dfsg1-3

dann frazier wrote: > hey release team, > systemimager 3.6.3dfsg1-3 was uploaded to unstable yesterday with > Urgency=high. Please allow this release to propagate into etch. > > There are two changes in this release beyond the version in etch. > One fixes a release critical bug (due to toolchain

Re: Please unblock console-setup 1.14

Christian Perrier wrote: > Dear release team, > > I have just uploaded a NMU of console-setup, to fix its pending l10n > issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). > > Could you consider hinting it to enter testing? > > The NMU changelog is: Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://p

Re: Please unblock gforge 4.5.14-21

Luk Claes, 2007-03-07 19:55:14 +0100 : > This revision introduces the following directory which I assume > shouldn't be included? If so, please remove it in a new upload. Shoot, you're right. I'll build and upload -22 right away. Sorry about that. Roland. -- Roland Mas Chaos always defeats o

Re: please review xorg-server 2:1.1.1-20

Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > at the request of Guillem Jover, I just uploaded xorg-server 2:1.1.1-20, > which contains a patch from upstream to fix a memory leak in Xephyr, and > would be nice to have in etch. Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 102

Re: Please unblock gforge 4.5.14-21

Roland Mas wrote: > Hi, > > I just uploaded a new version of gforge, with the following changes: > >* More input sanitisation, fixing more cross-site scripting > vulnerabilities. Again, security implications cause the high urgency. >* Also, make sure that the registration procedure

Freeze exception for systemimager 3.6.3dfsg1-3

hey release team, systemimager 3.6.3dfsg1-3 was uploaded to unstable yesterday with Urgency=high. Please allow this release to propagate into etch. There are two changes in this release beyond the version in etch. One fixes a release critical bug (due to toolchain changes, the ia64 build was use

Re: Please unblock orville-write 2.55-2.1

Christian Perrier wrote: > Dear release team, > > I have just uploaded a NMU of orville-write, to fix its pending l10n > issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). > > Could you consider hinting it to enter testing? Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG

Re: Please consider pushing gnochm 0.9.8-1.1 into etch

Ganesan Rajagopal wrote: > Hi, > > I NMU'd gnochm to fix a usability bug (Debian Bug #401830). This is > fixed in upstream 0.9.9 version. I pulled a one line patch to fix this > for etch. Please consider unfreezing gnochm for etch. Here's the > debian changelog. Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk C

Re: Unblock optipng-0.5.5-1

Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Hi Cosmin, hi release managers! Hi Nelson > I am forwarding an email that Cosmin Truta, upstream author of OptiPNG > sent to me and Luk. Sorry, must have missed it, good thing that you resend it to debian-release! > OptiPNG is already one month on unstable, withou

Re: please unblock gpm 1.19.6-25

Peter Samuelson wrote: > Yet another l10n-only gpm upload, 1.19.6-25. Please unblock. Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital si

Re: Please hint sqlite3 NMU

Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to ask for a hint on the sqlite3 source package. Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPG

Re: please allow libgksu 2.0.3-7 to go into Etch

Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: [some explanations :-)] > I believe this is the kind of thing that should work alright for us to > have a great desktop by default, therefore I request this update. Unblocked. > Also, let me take the oportunity to request that the release team take > some time, if po

Re: RC-ness of this bug

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:28:09PM -0500, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote: > > I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another > > situation > > that makes it much worse: > > > > - User boots off USB stick > > - sda is USB, sdb is SCSI

Please unblock console-setup 1.14

Dear release team, I have just uploaded a NMU of console-setup, to fix its pending l10n issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Could you consider hinting it to enter testing? The NMU changelog is: Source: console-setup Version: 1.14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Chri

etch: git-core 1:1.4.4.4-2 through t-p-u

Hi, I suggest to fix bug #413629 in etch with version 1:1.4.4.4-2. sid already has git-core 1:1.5.0.x, so it needs to go through t-p-u. etch currently has 1:1.4.4.4-1, debdiff is attached, is uploading ok with you? Thanks, Gerrit. diff -u git-core-1.4.4.4/debian/changelog git-core-1.4.4.4/debian

Re: RC-ness of this bug

Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote: > I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another situation > that makes it much worse: > > - User boots off USB stick > - sda is USB, sdb is SCSI or SATA > - GRUB install on (hd0) (i.e. sda) fails. > - Manual repairing is not possible, b

please review xorg-server 2:1.1.1-20

Hi, at the request of Guillem Jover, I just uploaded xorg-server 2:1.1.1-20, which contains a patch from upstream to fix a memory leak in Xephyr, and would be nice to have in etch. Thanks, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

please permit upload of new kernel-patch-exec-shield

The exec-shield patch in testing (2.6.18-2) broke with the recent kernel update. I have prepared a fixed version, 2.6.18-3. I cannot upload it to unstable since there is already a version 2.6.20-2 there. Can I upload it to testing-proposed-updates? Regards, Marcus diff -u kernel-patch-exec-s

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

On Wed, March 7, 2007 13:55, Otavio Salvador said: > I don't know how invasive those changes might be. AFAIK Ubuntu already > does it (Colin?) and wouldn't be too hard to pick the changes from > them but we would also need RM and Frans approval :( initramfs-tools already supports using /dev/disk/b

Re: Please unblock desktop-base/4.0.1

On 3/6/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Gustavo, On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:57:43AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > I would like to ask desktop-base 4.0.1 unblock. 4.0.0.1 that was > uploaded to experimental and merged on 4.0.1 fixed four bugs. With > 4.0.1 we've finally common a

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:55:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > > With USB, you can't just boot a rescue system and repair a broken install > > from there, because /dev/sda will still be your USB drive. > > > > Of course, there are lots of hacks you can do to workaround that, but if > > we g

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

"Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:55:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> > >> > With USB, you can't just boot a rescue system and repair a broken install >> > from there, because /dev/sda will still be your USB drive. >> > >> > Of course, there a

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:33:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > >> > >> > On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

"Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:33:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) write

Re: RC-ness of this bug

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 07, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Labels are not well tested and a source of problems indeed. > The /dev/disk/by-*/ devices are well tested and I do not know about > problems posed by them. I thou

Re: RC-ness of this bug

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 01:26:47PM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On Mar 07, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Labels are not well tested and a source of problems indeed. > > The /dev/disk/by-

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

"Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: >> >> > On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> I urge you to reconsider severity of this probl

Please unblock gforge 4.5.14-21

Hi, I just uploaded a new version of gforge, with the following changes: * More input sanitisation, fixing more cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Again, security implications cause the high urgency. * Also, make sure that the registration procedure happens over SSL. * New debco

Re: RC-ness of this bug

On Mar 07, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Labels are not well tested and a source of problems indeed. The /dev/disk/by-*/ devices are well tested and I do not know about problems posed by them. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

please allow libgksu 2.0.3-7 to go into Etch

Hello, A user found a bug in libgksu which would lead it to work incorrectly if the user asks it to save the root password in the GNOME Keyring (when using su as backend) on a clean install - if they request gksu to store the password in the keyring, the password would not be stored because the de

Re: RC-ness of this bug

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:41:19PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:15:23PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another > > > situation > > > tha

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > > > On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another > >> situation > >> that makes it much wo

Re: Mozilla codebase releases 1.8.1.2 and 1.8.0.10

* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:05:09PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:38:02PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:13:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > > > Eric Dorland <[EMA

Re: Please unblock ekiga/2.0.3-4 and remove gnomemeeting from testing afterwards

Hi, On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 07:15:12PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:02:44PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > > > > - no IPv6 support > > > This is regrettable, but not RC (and I've downgraded it). > > > I'm a bit disturbed about the non-RCness here; that's a major regres