Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Hi, On Sun May 20, 2007 at 19:44:35 +0100, Simon Huggins wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 09:48:22PM +, Martin Zobel-Helas - automated mail > wrote: > > muttstable1.5.13-1.1 alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 mips > > mipsel powerpc s390 sparc source > > muttupdates

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 09:48:22PM +, Martin Zobel-Helas - automated mail wrote: > muttstable1.5.13-1.1 alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 mips > mipsel powerpc s390 sparc source > muttupdates 1.5.13-1.1etch1 alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel > powerpc s390 spar

Re: Permission to update lifelines in the next stable point release (4.0r1)

Hi, On Mon May 07, 2007 at 15:46:52 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > At 1178512994 time_t, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: > > I would like to fix #405500 in the next point release, > > it is a missing Conflicts, so is it possible to include it? > > Ok. > > > What is the recommende

Re: Stable update request: nano

Hi, On Thu May 17, 2007 at 08:11:57 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 17 May 2007 02:03, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > Not reviewed the patch yet, BUT i will only give my okay, if i get > > an explicite ACK from Frans for that. > > No objection to accepting it. please upload. -- [EMA

Re: stable update request: Bug#424729: libpng: CVE-2007-2445 VU#684664

Hi, On Sat May 19, 2007 at 11:32:02 +1000, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:20:35PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > >An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] in Bcc list] > >> > >>On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 08:15:42AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > >>>On Thursday

Re: [SRM] debootstrap from testing for Etch

Hi, On Sat May 19, 2007 at 08:29:43 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 19 May 2007 00:44, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > On Thu May 17, 2007 at 21:04:16 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > > Please consider accepting debootstrap from testing (0.3.3.3) for > > > Etch. > > > > > > Reason is that the vers

Re: [SRM] file 4.17-5etch2

Hi, On Fri May 18, 2007 at 10:25:22 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Hi, > > there was some possible DoS attack with an OS/2 magic of file > discovered, CVE-2007-2026 namely. The security team said, it doesn't > warrant issueing a DSA, that's why I'd like to update it through etch > r1, debdiff is

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Hi, On Sun May 20, 2007 at 17:29:19 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: > Unrar (source package unrar-nonfree) has CVE-2007-0855 (Stack-based buffer > overflow) bug in etch and sarge. It has debian bug #410580 > Maintainer didn't ask for it but should 1:3.7.3-1 be included in 4.0r1? yes, please upload.

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Unrar (source package unrar-nonfree) has CVE-2007-0855 (Stack-based buffer overflow) bug in etch and sarge. It has debian bug #410580 Maintainer didn't ask for it but should 1:3.7.3-1 be included in 4.0r1? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Hi, On Sun May 20, 2007 at 10:47:18 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Saturday 19 May 2007 23:48, Martin Zobel-Helas - automated mail wrote: > > Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0r1 > > thanks for working on this! > > > An up-to-date version is at

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Hi, On Sun May 20, 2007 at 11:31:06 +0300, Teodor wrote: > On 5/20/07, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Sun May 20, 2007 at 00:11:44 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > >> On Saturday 19 May 2007 23:48, Martin Zobel-Helas - automated mail wrote: > >> > An up-to-date vers

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Hi, On Saturday 19 May 2007 23:48, Martin Zobel-Helas - automated mail wrote: > Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0r1 thanks for working on this! > An up-to-date version is at . fai-kernels (1.17+etch3) is missing there. regards, Holger p

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

On 5/20/07, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, On Sun May 20, 2007 at 00:11:44 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Saturday 19 May 2007 23:48, Martin Zobel-Helas - automated mail wrote: > > An up-to-date version is at . > > This yields a

Re: [Help] AMD64 specific bug on libblitz0 (#424644) (fwd)

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 08:42:55AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > >>can you please do a binNMU of package libblitz0 to close #424644. > >Are you sure that amd64 is the only architecture affected by this problem? > I'm absolutely unsure because I have n

Re: [Help] AMD64 specific bug on libblitz0 (#424644) (fwd)

On Sat, 19 May 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: can you please do a binNMU of package libblitz0 to close #424644. Are you sure that amd64 is the only architecture affected by this problem? I'm absolutely unsure because I have no idea how to verify this failsafe. Do you have a reasonable proposal,