Steve Langasek writes:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 12:00:50PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > I know I should provide a full binNMU list for python2.5 related
> > packages, but at least this one is needed to fix the RC bug #424441.
> > Probably other will follow.
>
> Actually, the fix for #42444
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 07:47:46PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Can someone please schedule a binNMU for the following:
> knoda_0.8.3-1, 1, Rebuild against libhk-classes15ldbl, alpha amd64 arm hppa
> i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
> and adding a dep-wait on hk-classes >= 0.8.3-2 on hppa?
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 07:46:22PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Can someone please schedule a binNMU for the following:
> mimedefang_2.61-1, 1, Rebuild against libmilter1, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386
> ia64
Scheduled.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Fr
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 07:45:22PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Can someone please schedule a binNMU for the following:
> koffice_1:1.6.3-1, 1, Rebuild against libpqxx-2.6.9ldbl, alpha amd64 arm hppa
> i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
Scheduled (along with m68k as well).
Thanks,
--
Steve
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 05:47:15PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > libgpod had a soname change. The following rdepends should probably be
> > binNMUed (I've built all of them locally successfully against the new
> > version):
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:11:54PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 01:29:47PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> >Packages that depend on libode0c2: python-pyode, xmoto, python-soya,
> >python-pyepl, and indirectly:
> as of today those packages appear to be still broke
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 04:46:38PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> ggz-grubby_0.0.14-1, Rebuild against libsilc-1.1-2, +b1, alpha amd64 arm
> hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
Superseded in the meantime by a maintainer upload.
> silky_0.5.4-0.1, Rebuild against libsilc-1.1-2,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 12:00:50PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> I know I should provide a full binNMU list for python2.5 related
> packages, but at least this one is needed to fix the RC bug #424441.
> Probably other will follow.
Actually, the fix for #424441 is to binNMU pyogg rather than py
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:19:14AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
> not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
> of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
>
> If you h
Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can someone please schedule a binNMU for the following:
>
> knoda_0.8.3-1, 1, Rebuild against libhk-classes15ldbl, alpha amd64 arm hppa
> i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
>
> and adding a dep-wait on hk-classes >= 0.8.3-2 on hppa?
Hmm, I meant dep-wait libhk-cl
Hi
Can someone please schedule binNMUs for the following:
gretl_1.6.5-1, 1, Rebuild against libmpfr1ldbl, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64
mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
wcalc_2.2.2-2, 1 , Rebuild against libmpfr1ldbl, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386
ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
Cheers
Luk
--
Hi
Can someone please schedule a binNMU for the following:
knoda_0.8.3-1, 1, Rebuild against libhk-classes15ldbl, alpha amd64 arm hppa
i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
and adding a dep-wait on hk-classes >= 0.8.3-2 on hppa?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Hi
Can someone please schedule a binNMU for the following:
mimedefang_2.61-1, 1, Rebuild against libmilter1, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Can someone please schedule a binNMU for the following:
koffice_1:1.6.3-1, 1, Rebuild against libpqxx-2.6.9ldbl, alpha amd64 arm hppa
i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> libgpod had a soname change. The following rdepends should probably be
> binNMUed (I've built all of them locally successfully against the new
> version):
[...]
> rhythmbox_0.10.1-1, rebuild against libgpod2, 1, alpha amd64 arm hp
Camm,
your email is bounding for me!
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 06:14:46PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Sure. I suppose we still have testsuite failures in
> blas/lapack/atlas, yes? I'll try to take a look. Is refblas3 as good
> a place to start as any?
you need to you -ffloat-store gfortran opt
Hi,
can you please schedule a give back for obconf on all archs?
It depended on openbox-dev on build time which was in NEW.
Thanks
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgpSrpvCMfZHV.pgp
Coin,
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Marc Dequènes [Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:40:10 +0200]:
>
>> Is there a minimum number of packages involved to ask the release team
>> for an autobuild binNUM ?
>
> 1
Ok, then please schedule a soya build because of the libode ABI
breackage.
Thanks.
18 matches
Mail list logo