transition to ocaml 3.10

Hi releasers, we, members of the OCaml team, feel ready to start transitioning packages from OCaml 3.09.2 to OCaml 3.10 in unstable. A list of the involved packages is available at [1]. I'm hereby asking for your permission to go forward with this transition. Many thanks in advance. Cheers.

RM: firebird1.5 -- RoM; unsupported upstream; security issues

Dear release managers, Please remove firebird1.5 and its binary packages from testing. The package is unsupported by upstream and has security bugs[1] that are not fixable by the Debian maintainer (yours truly). Request to remove it from unstable is under way. The current version in testing is

Re: RM: firebird1.5 -- RoM; unsupported upstream; security issues

* Damyan Ivanov [Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:32:33 +0300]: Request to remove it from unstable is under way. Hello Damyan. For packages meant to be removed from unstable, we just let them disappear from sid first, and they disappear from testing automatically afterwards. Thanks, -- Adeodato Simó

Re: transition to ocaml 3.10

Hi, Hi releasers, we, members of the OCaml team, feel ready to start transitioning packages from OCaml 3.09.2 to OCaml 3.10 in unstable. A list of the involved packages is available at [1]. I'm hereby asking for your permission to go forward with this transition. I'm not a release

Re: transition to ocaml 3.10

On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:23:29PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: I use 'advi' and care about it, and I noticed that it's not in the list[1]. Is the list comprehensive? It is up to bug / strangeness in the interested packages :-) In particular I just noticed that advi does not declare a direct

Please hint openssl into testing.

Hi, Could you please hint openssl into testing? It has a udeb. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please hint openssl into testing.

Hi, On Mon Aug 20, 2007 at 19:07:50 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Hi, Could you please hint openssl into testing? It has a udeb. Debian Installer Team, comments? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manual entry for real-life -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Please push nfs-utils 1:1.1.1~git-20070709-3 into testing

Hi, nfs-utils 1:1.1.1~git-20070709-3 fixes a bug that results in obscure and rather hard-to-track-down issues compared to the version currently in testing. Given that it's been five days in unstable (with no known regressions over the version in testing), would it be possible to bump its urgency?

Re: linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete

On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:52:52AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On 2007-08-18, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks The linux-latest-2.6 update in 4.0r1 was incomplete. arm still have the version 6, anything

Re: IPv6 in Debian

* before A DNS lookup (it might be that the implementation of RFC3484 as described in the libc6 change 2006-05-18 David Woodhouse as found in /usr/share/doc/libc6/changelog.gz might have solved this particular problem) Partly. It fixed the issue of clients trying to

Re: linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete

On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:10:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:52:52AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On 2007-08-18, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks The linux-latest-2.6 update

Re: transition to ocaml 3.10

On 8/21/07, Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:23:29PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: I use 'advi' and care about it, and I noticed that it's not in the list[1]. Is the list comprehensive? It is up to bug / strangeness in the interested packages :-) In