[ CCed maintainers for delicate rev-depends ]
Hi,
Some weeks ago I uploaded directfb 1.0.1-2 to experimental. I've
successfully built the following packages, which are the only ones
really Build-Depending on libdirectfb-dev:
In unstable
---
directvnc_0.7.5-8
freesci_0.3.5-5
gst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi RMs,
Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact 1.11.
This package has CJK fonts are needed for newer d-i.
I believe it's safe to unfreeze this package usually because
this udeb package is related with only CJK fonts of GUI d-i.
Thanks,
- --
Kenshi Muto
[EM
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The following packages need a round of binNMUs as soon as possible, to
> build extensions for python2.5, after which they shouldn't bother us.
> Can anyone schedule the binNMUs please?
> bitpim
Please don't bother with this one; BitPim actual
free adalt passwords
www 32action dot cn
displeasing umbilically
digitizing orderers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could someone prepare update for unrar-nonfree to next etch point
release fixing security issues?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Glibc upstream announced recently that the glibc 2.7 will be tagged
> and released very soon (probably on Oct 17[0]).
which toolchain versions are required as build dependencies?
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Hi -releasers,
can you please schedule a binNMU for the source package gtkmathview on
amd64? Unfortunately I'm not entirely sure that it is the proper
solution, since I did not (also after talking with upstream et al) about
what was the cause of the crash, but we are quite convinced it was some
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:16:59AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Glibc upstream announced recently that the glibc 2.7 will be tagged
> > and released very soon (probably on Oct 17[0]).
>
> which toolchain versions are required as build dependencies?
AFAICT it should be basically the same as
Hi,
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libparmetis3.1: Depends: libmpich1.0c2 but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
Glibc upstream announced recently that the glibc 2.7 will be tagged
and released very soon (probably on Oct 17[0]). This release (for what
I've seen) has a lot of bugfixes (on nscd, locales, and many issues we
reported in Debian). It also has the stubs to use eventfd's and
timerfd's (new l
10 matches
Mail list logo