>
> BinNMUs are needed for the *reverse depends* of fftw3, not of fftw3
> itself.
>
>
I don't understand. Maybe I have some misconceptions about BinNMUs? I
thought that a BinNMU was, in this case, a binary .deb of fftw3, so that
packages that depend on fftw3 can be installed.
Am I wrong?
(Cc to m
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 09:34:58PM +0100, David wrote:
> Those packages were removed from sid many days ago but there are important
> packages that depend on them
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/10/msg00194.html
debian-release is not a write-only list.
--
Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 09:25:19PM +0100, David wrote:
> A point makes me think that something is wrong: my "local or obsolete"
> version is 3.1.2-2. On the developer's web
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fftw3.html it reads that the new version
> 3.1.2-3 was accepted on 3 October. Is there any
Hi,
> A point makes me think that something is wrong: my "local or obsolete"
> version is 3.1.2-2. On the developer's web
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fftw3.html it reads that the new version
> 3.1.2-3 was accepted on 3 October. Is there any error, that it is taking so
> long?
http://bjorn.h
Those packages were removed from sid many days ago but there are important
packages that depend on them (a lot on the former, vlc on the latter).
Please Cc replies to me
Yours,
David
Hello,
>From many weeks ago, I have fftw3 under "local or obsolete". If I try to
remove it, apt wants to remove a lot.
A point makes me think that something is wrong: my "local or obsolete"
version is 3.1.2-2. On the developer's web
http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fftw3.html it reads that the new
sorbet【~】$ lynx --dump http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba | grep
-A4 emboss
## 427439 emboss emboss: Binary name clash with other programs.
## popcon: 29
# 427439
remove emboss/5.0.0-1 emboss-explorer/2.2.0-3
Dear release team,
emboss-explorer is not affected by by 427439, which has
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 06:47:02AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Looks like 10/31 @ 18:00 GMT works for most, so lets do that.
Oh, and I guess we should pick a location :) I propose #debian-release
for now, when can discuss where to hold future meetings in this one.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUB
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 06:24:56PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> (sorry for the nasty cross-posting)
>
> hey,
> Now that 2.6.23 is out and the proposed timeframe for etch 1/2 is
> just over two months away, its probably a good time to start making
> some progress on an etch 1/2.
>
> Perhaps we s
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Console-data provides udebs for D-I use and therefore needs manual
>> approval to enter testing.
>
>
> Sorry for being annoying but could this be considered?
>
> As partly responsible of this part in D-I, I can guarante
Neil Williams wrote:
> Please can emdebian-tools, apt-cross and dpkg-cross be hinted to go
> into testing together?
>
> Each is waiting for the others and all are now 10days old or older.
hint added
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
11 matches
Mail list logo
