Davide Viti wrote:
> Hi,
> it would be great if you could unblock ttf-dejavu 2.23-1 which
> fixes an important issue [1].
unblocked.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> it would be great if you could unblock ttf-dejavu 2.23-1 which
> fixes an important issue [1].
>
> Thanx alot in advance,
> Davide
>
> [1]
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=2007
> > exiv2-0.16-1 uploaded today. it's in the NEW queue.
>
> Ok, sounds good.
exiv2 goes out of NEW some days go and is installed everywhere.
following packages need a binNMU:
ufraw
python-pyexiv2
libkexiv2-3
kphotoalbum
gwenview
gpscorrelate-gui
gpscorrelate
gimp-ufraw
digikam
cheers,
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> I have been quite disappointed that there was no real follow-up to my
> mails, which now leaves us in the situation that there is basically no
> support yet to select the correct kernel for etch+1/2.
Being the sucker that I am, I did start to look int
[I am Cc:ing this message to debian-release; perhaps the release folks will
have some helpful comment on this.]
In the process of preparing the 3.1.0-1 release of libsuitesparse, I noticed
a serious problem regarding the soversion numbers of the libraries shipped
in this package. The soversion nu
Hi,
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
[I am Cc:ing this message to debian-release; perhaps the release folks will
have some helpful comment on this.]
In the process of preparing the 3.1.0-1 release of libsuitesparse, I noticed
a serious problem regarding the soversion numbers of the libraries shipped
i
Hi,
Comparing http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/ChangeLog with
http://release.debian.org/stable/3.1/3.1r7/ I find atleast
the following new versions missing in the second document:
ethereal 0.10.10-2sarge10
id3lib3.8.3 3.8.3-4.1sarge1
libnss-ldap 238-1sarge1
libopenssl-ruby 0.1.4a-1sarge1
m
Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Good question.
> At least for KDE 4 Apps there is no Problem -- kdesu from KDE 4 is
> always around if kdelibs5 (the KDE 4 libraries) is installed.
> When you have a KDE 3 Desktop kdebase-bin is normally around so kdesu
> should be there.
> What about Gn
On Monday 04 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I'd like to ask for urgency bumping of grub 0.97-30 to get it in
> testing ASAP since it solves a critical problem for Debian Installer
> testing.
>
> For a better background, please look at #463236, #463123.
I have tested that the new grub inst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'd like to ask for urgency bumping of grub 0.97-30 to get it in
testing ASAP since it solves a critical problem for Debian Installer
testing.
For a better background, please look at #463236, #463123.
Hint:
urgent grub/0.97-30
TIA,
- --
On Sun, 03 Feb 08 15:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 03 Feb 08 13:20, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> I don't think this is necessary. su-to-root falls back to su if none
> >> of the other packages exist, and su is essential. Similarly, under X,
> >> it
On lun, 2008-02-04 at 12:40 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Or Xfce? Is gksu installed by default?
>
> Xfce probably doesn't pull in any of the various wrappers, so the
> default
> on Xfce would probably be su in an xterm.
Yeah, gksu takes too much gnome dependencies for being a requirement in
Xfc
Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On lun, 2008-02-04 at 12:40 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Xfce probably doesn't pull in any of the various wrappers, so the
>> default on Xfce would probably be su in an xterm.
> Yeah, gksu takes too much gnome dependencies for being a requirement i
Hi,
New upstream version of libmrss broked some rdepends including rsstail
please rebuild it in all arches to solve this issue.
(more info at: # 464019)
Cheers
--
Rene Mauricio Mayorga | GPG: A209C305
http://rmayorga.org |
-
On lun, 2008-02-04 at 22:29 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Maybe there are some alternatives, but currently using su in
> x-terminal-emulator would be ok.
There is ktsuss (http://nomius.blogspot.com/2007/04/my-new-tool.html)
wich is not in Debian.
I may have a look and test it in Xfce environm
Hi,
* Rene Mayorga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-05 07:37]:
> New upstream version of libmrss broked some rdepends including rsstail
> please rebuild it in all arches to solve this issue.
Please also rebuild newsbeuter.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - G
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to ask for urgency bumping of grub 0.97-30 to get it in
> testing ASAP since it solves a critical problem for Debian Installer
> testing.
>
> For a better background, please look at #463236, #463123.
>
> Hint:
>
> urgent grub/0.97-30
Added urgent hi
On lun, 2008-02-04 at 14:32 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> sux would be the other alternative that I know of that's already in
> Debian, but I've never even installed it, let alone run it, so I don't
> know how it looks and whether it would fit with Xfce.
sux seems to only be a wrapper around su to
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:46:05PM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> please schedule a binNMU for gst0.10-python on all archs against
> libgstreamer0.10-0 (>= 0.10.17) and libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 (>=
> 0.10.17). The old version, 0.10.16, had an accidental ABI breakage.
Does this mean that v
19 matches
Mail list logo
