Re: qt-x11-free uploads

2008-02-21 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Friday 22 February 2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Would it be possible to hold off on more qt-x11-free uploads so that the > libofx transition can occur? They are linked through kymymoney2. I think the current upload might be suitable for migrating. None of the previous one were. > The l

Re: Noise

2008-02-21 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Le February 21, 2008 07:05:45 pm Neil McGovern, vous avez écrit : > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:32:25PM -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > > Le February 21, 2008 05:12:09 pm Lucas Nussbaum, vous avez écrit : > > > > OMG, we were talking about migration of Linux 2.6.24 to testing. > > > > > > "we"? Se

Re: X.org plans for the lenny cycle

2008-02-21 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 03:06:57PM +1100, Niv Sardi wrote: > I forwarded that information internaly to my manager about a week ago > (after a discution with jcristeau), I believe that the message is: > * If it affects only Debian SGI (as a corporation) will not care and > treat us as a bunch of nit

Re: Give back lam on alpha

2008-02-21 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:47:41PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Since gcc on alpha was affected by #442036, lam FTBFSed due to an ICE > > on alpha. The recent upload of gfortran+gcc-4.3 yesterday (gcc-4.3 > > 4.3-20080219-1) should have fixed this problem, since another affected > > package see

qt-x11-free uploads

2008-02-21 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Would it be possible to hold off on more qt-x11-free uploads so that the libofx transition can occur? They are linked through kymymoney2. The latest upload happened just in time, it seems to prevent the previous version from transitioning, as did the one before that. And the latest (3:3.3.8b-4)

Re: Noise

2008-02-21 Thread Neil McGovern
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:32:25PM -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > Le February 21, 2008 05:12:09 pm Lucas Nussbaum, vous avez écrit : > > > OMG, we were talking about migration of Linux 2.6.24 to testing. > > > > "we"? Seriously, Philippe. You are not a DD. You are not in NM. You > > don't (co-)

Noise

2008-02-21 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Le February 21, 2008 05:12:09 pm Lucas Nussbaum, vous avez écrit : > (dropped -kernel@ and -boot@ from Cc) > > On 15/02/08 at 14:29 -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > > Le February 15, 2008 05:15:16 am maximilian attems, vous avez écrit : > > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > > > > >

Re: Please add following hint to block linux-2.6 until Beta1 is out

2008-02-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
(dropped -kernel@ and -boot@ from Cc) On 15/02/08 at 14:29 -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > Le February 15, 2008 05:15:16 am maximilian attems, vous avez écrit : > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > > > > that is totally untrue. > > > > linux-2.6 always needs hint from the release

Re: Give back lam on alpha

2008-02-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:40:48AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Since gcc on alpha was affected by #442036, lam FTBFSed due to an ICE > on alpha. The recent upload of gfortran+gcc-4.3 yesterday (gcc-4.3 > 4.3-20080219-1) should have fixed this problem, since another affected > package seems to ha

Re: Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?

2008-02-21 Thread Daniel Baumann
so.. what is the status of this? bill, do you intend to hand over su-to-root to debianutils? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

2008-02-21 Thread Samuel Mimram
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:42:19PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> Can someone please schedule them? > > Any news? Apparently not... It would be very nice if the binNMUs could be scheduled soon since all the packages depending (directly or indirectly) on ocaml are