On Friday 22 February 2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Would it be possible to hold off on more qt-x11-free uploads so that the
> libofx transition can occur? They are linked through kymymoney2.
I think the current upload might be suitable for migrating. None of the
previous one were.
> The l
Le February 21, 2008 07:05:45 pm Neil McGovern, vous avez écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:32:25PM -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> > Le February 21, 2008 05:12:09 pm Lucas Nussbaum, vous avez écrit :
> > > > OMG, we were talking about migration of Linux 2.6.24 to testing.
> > >
> > > "we"? Se
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 03:06:57PM +1100, Niv Sardi wrote:
> I forwarded that information internaly to my manager about a week ago
> (after a discution with jcristeau), I believe that the message is:
> * If it affects only Debian SGI (as a corporation) will not care and
> treat us as a bunch of nit
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:47:41PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Since gcc on alpha was affected by #442036, lam FTBFSed due to an ICE
> > on alpha. The recent upload of gfortran+gcc-4.3 yesterday (gcc-4.3
> > 4.3-20080219-1) should have fixed this problem, since another affected
> > package see
Would it be possible to hold off on more qt-x11-free uploads so that the
libofx transition can occur? They are linked through kymymoney2.
The latest upload happened just in time, it seems to prevent the
previous version from transitioning, as did the one before that. And
the latest (3:3.3.8b-4)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:32:25PM -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> Le February 21, 2008 05:12:09 pm Lucas Nussbaum, vous avez écrit :
> > > OMG, we were talking about migration of Linux 2.6.24 to testing.
> >
> > "we"? Seriously, Philippe. You are not a DD. You are not in NM. You
> > don't (co-)
Le February 21, 2008 05:12:09 pm Lucas Nussbaum, vous avez écrit :
> (dropped -kernel@ and -boot@ from Cc)
>
> On 15/02/08 at 14:29 -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> > Le February 15, 2008 05:15:16 am maximilian attems, vous avez écrit :
> > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> > > > >
(dropped -kernel@ and -boot@ from Cc)
On 15/02/08 at 14:29 -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> Le February 15, 2008 05:15:16 am maximilian attems, vous avez écrit :
> > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> > > > that is totally untrue.
> > > > linux-2.6 always needs hint from the release
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:40:48AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Since gcc on alpha was affected by #442036, lam FTBFSed due to an ICE
> on alpha. The recent upload of gfortran+gcc-4.3 yesterday (gcc-4.3
> 4.3-20080219-1) should have fixed this problem, since another affected
> package seems to ha
so.. what is the status of this? bill, do you intend to hand over
su-to-root to debianutils?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:42:19PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> Can someone please schedule them?
>
> Any news?
Apparently not... It would be very nice if the binNMUs could be
scheduled soon since all the packages depending (directly or indirectly)
on ocaml are
11 matches
Mail list logo