On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 11:20:41AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 04.03.2008, 00:02 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:15:00AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > could you please schedule binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2? The previous
> > > one
(This is probably not the right mailing list for this discussion.)
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is certainly a consensus to use it for (Debian) menu entry and it
> is seldom used.
su-to-root is not *that* seldomly used. Out of the 48 menu entries on my
system, two use it,
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 05:27:12PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > Please also remember that xdg-utils is Priority: optional while
> > debianutils
> > > is Essential: yes, Priority: required; meaning that if packages were to
> > > use 'xdg-su-wrapper' they would have to Depend on xdg-utils
Hello Bill,
First of all sorry for the late response, I've been very busy with RL lately.
On 03/03/2008, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:58:49AM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
> > IMHO we can not just 'give up' because there's no common way to do it; if
Hi
I'll upload to stable then.
It will take a few days as I want to verify the correction
and run it though my normal stability tests.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:36:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 21:26:56 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > Hi
>
Hi
What is the distribution that I should use for this upload?
stable etch stable-proposed-updates or something else?
Best regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 02:39:37PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:59:51PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > I have got a report abou
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 21:26:56 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> What is the distribution that I should use for this upload?
> stable etch stable-proposed-updates or something else?
>
Either "stable" or "proposed-updates".
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 09:25:43AM -0800, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
>> Could you please give-back cernlib version 2006.dfsg.2-11 on mipsel? It
>> previously failed to build on Feb. 29 [1] due to an attempt to compile
>> it before a build-dependency (liblapack-dev) was avai
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:59:51PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I have got a report about this bug #469293, that is about data corruption
> during a migration function that exist within vzctl.
>
> The fix is simple, but I need to know if it is possible to get this fix
> in the next version (r4) o
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 02:32:03PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Note that I did not include hdparm in my list of "problem" packages, so that
> can be hinted as well:
> unblock hdparm/8.3-1
Done.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer
: :' :
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> RM team, please apply only win32-loader one. Others I ask again after
> images be done.
Note that I did not include hdparm in my list of "problem" packages, so that
can be hinted as well:
unblock hdparm/8.3-1
signature.asc
Description: This
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:42:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> RM team, please apply only win32-loader one. Others I ask again after
> images be done.
win32-loader unblocked.
Cheers,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> unblock gtk+2.0/2.12.8-1
>> unblock win32-loader/0.6.3
>> unblock openssl/0.9.8g-7
>> unblock ttf-sil-abyssinica/1.0-4
>
> IMO these would be better left unt
Hi
I have got a report about this bug #469293, that is about data corruption
during a migration function that exist within vzctl.
The fix is simple, but I need to know if it is possible to get this fix
in the next version (r4) of etch.
It would really be good because this bug is a nasty one.
Th
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 09:25:43AM -0800, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Could you please give-back cernlib version 2006.dfsg.2-11 on mipsel? It
> previously failed to build on Feb. 29 [1] due to an attempt to compile
> it before a build-dependency (liblapack-dev) was available. (Not sure
> why it wa
15 matches
Mail list logo
