On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
...
> FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results
> than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in the *glibc*.
>
> So it *seems* HPPA is ready for gcc-4.3 by default.
Has anyone built a kernel
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 06:54:41PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 05:39:49PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 14:11 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Can you please explain why you think this is a proper fix for the
> > > problem?
> > Because the error
Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Barth skrev:
>> * Lennart Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 22:26]:
>>> I suspect by the time a fully working multiarch is done, x86 won't need
>>> it anymore because everything will be fully 64bit. :)
>
> As Wine maintainer, I'd disagree with th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:03:54PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
>> > Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
>> >include files in the multiarch locations.
>>
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
>> Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
>>include files in the multiarch locations.
>> Bug-Url: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369064
>>
Le Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:43:12PM +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
> Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Dear maintainer and Stable release team,
> >
> > One user on the debian-user-french mailing list noted that the bug
> > 432665 was rendering the package useless but is apparently not fixed in
> > a point rele
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said:
> libgmime had an ABI change (it changed sizeof(off_t)) without a soname
> bump. As a short term work around, I've NMUed it with a package rename.
> This means it will hit NEW, but when it comes out and is autobuilt,
> we'll need a small binNMU campa
Andreas Barth skrev:
* Lennart Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 22:26]:
I suspect by the time a fully working multiarch is done, x86 won't need
it anymore because everything will be fully 64bit. :)
As Wine maintainer, I'd disagree with that.
People, we want to release soon. Anyone is wel
* Lennart Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 22:26]:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:03:54PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
> > > Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
> > >include files in the multiarch l
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:03:54PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
> > Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
> >include files in the multiarch locations.
> > Bug-Url: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to suggest a new release goal
The release goal list is frozen. We will only drop goals, not add new
ones.
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
287: Palestinänsertipper
1 Anschlag pro Minute. (Bodo Eggert)
p
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
>> Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
>>include files in the multiarch locations.
>> Bug-Url: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369064
>>
* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-15 14:56:40 +0200]:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Josselin Mouette [Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:28:00 +0200]:
> > > The solution is really simple, just add them to python’s Provides: list.
> >
> > Plus, uhm, can't really be done for (c)el
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
> Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
>include files in the multiarch locations.
> Bug-Url: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369064
> State: All done except for binutils. Patch exists
Hi,
I would like to suggest a new release goal and hope that some DDs will
advocate it. This one is actualy quite trivial but some convincing
seems to be neccessary to get it done:
# Multiarch capable toolchain
Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
include files
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 05:39:49PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 14:11 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Can you please explain why you think this is a proper fix for the
> > problem?
> Because the error message displayed by xhotswap suggests that rebuilding
> would fix the pr
Vous avez des soucis pour visualiser ce mail, cliquez ici (
http://t.message-business.com?ContactId=C740DCBE97B3860073F29E9A7987BC4400&LinkId=6E2AD9DA694861C400&OprnId=97F1C61D890133D800&AcctId=1B124450E163433500
)
Faites facilement traduire vos brochures, votre site Intern
Oops - didn't mean to drop debian-x from the cc..
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:48:00AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 03:49:28PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 19:44:32 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> >
> > > Xorg driver (none yet).
> >
> > xserver-xo
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 03:49:28PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 19:44:32 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> > Xorg driver (none yet).
>
> xserver-xorg-video-nv is now in p-u. On to the next driver:
> I backported xserver-xorg-video-intel, packages are at
> http://people.d
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 14:11 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> Can you please explain why you think this is a proper fix for the
> problem?
Because the error message displayed by xhotswap suggests that rebuilding
would fix the problem. If it does not, then I will report a bug...
> Also you are not
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 16:09:22 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> This was installed but the Packages.bz2 won't list it. Does this mean it's
> waiting untill the next etch point release?
It means it's installed in proposed-updates:
$ wget -qO-
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/proposed-updates
* Robert Millan [Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:09:22 +0200]:
> This was installed but the Packages.bz2 won't list it. Does this mean it's
> waiting untill the next etch point release?
It's available in the Packages.gz file for *proposed-updates*. You are
correct that it'll only show up in Packages.gz for
This was installed but the Packages.bz2 won't list it. Does this mean it's
waiting untill the next etch point release?
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 07:52:32PM +, Debian Installer wrote:
>
> Accepted:
> grub-disk_0.97-27etch1_all.deb
> to pool/main/g/grub/grub-disk_0.97-27etch1_all.deb
> grub-d
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Adeodato Sim
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Josselin Mouette [Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:28:00 +0200]:
> > The solution is really simple, just add them to python’s Provides: list.
>
> Plus, uhm, can't really be done for (c)elementtree, since python 2.5
> provides the modules under a different name/name
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:31:37PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Dear release managers,
> could you please rebuild the hotswap source package to fix this bug ?
Can you please explain why you think this is a proper fix for the
problem?
> $ xhotswap
> xhotswap: Symbol `_XmStrings' has different s
On mar, 2008-04-15 at 12:46 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Josselin Mouette, 2008-04-15 12:32]
> > The solution is really simple, just add them to python’s Provides: list.
>
> python2.5 package already does that
But python does not:
Provides: python-email, python-xmlbase
> , the problem was th
* Josselin Mouette [Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:28:00 +0200]:
> On lun, 2008-04-14 at 22:57 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Finally, and quite importantly, there is what to do with modules that
> > have been added to the standard library in 2.5 (ctypes, celementtree,
> > wgsiref). These use either pycentr
[Josselin Mouette, 2008-04-15 12:32]
> On lun, 2008-04-14 at 22:57 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Finally, and quite importantly, there is what to do with modules that
> > have been added to the standard library in 2.5 (ctypes, celementtree,
> > wgsiref). These use either pycentral or pysupport, a
* Josselin Mouette [Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:28:00 +0200]:
> On lun, 2008-04-14 at 22:57 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Finally, and quite importantly, there is what to do with modules that
> > have been added to the standard library in 2.5 (ctypes, celementtree,
> > wgsiref). These use either pycentr
Dear release managers,
could you please rebuild the hotswap source package to fix this bug ?
$ xhotswap
xhotswap: Symbol `_XmStrings' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
--
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
On lun, 2008-04-14 at 22:57 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Finally, and quite importantly, there is what to do with modules that
> have been added to the standard library in 2.5 (ctypes, celementtree,
> wgsiref). These use either pycentral or pysupport, and since they mark
> themselves as for python
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 07:34:12AM +, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 08:39:03AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > Dear security team, you broke lighttpd badly with your last upload,
> > > because you use a broken patch to fix the last CVE on it. Plea
[Raphael Hertzog, 2008-04-15 09:31]
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Finally, and quite importantly, there is what to do with modules that
> > have been added to the standard library in 2.5 (ctypes, celementtree,
> > wgsiref). These use either pycentral or pysupport, and since they m
/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk seems to be missing from that
build daemon:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=shogun&arch=mips&ver=0.6.0-1&stamp=1208216597&file=log&as=raw
Automatic build of shogun_0.6.0-1 on ball by sbuild/mips 99.99
Checking for already installed source dependen
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 08:39:03AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Dear security team, you broke lighttpd badly with your last upload,
> > because you use a broken patch to fix the last CVE on it. Please update
> > the patch, using e.g. the one in the unstable version inst
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Finally, and quite importantly, there is what to do with modules that
> have been added to the standard library in 2.5 (ctypes, celementtree,
> wgsiref). These use either pycentral or pysupport, and since they mark
> themselves as for python << 2.5 only,
37 matches
Mail list logo
