Hello,
it looks like it would be possible to get rid of obsolete libpcap0.7.
It should be sufficient to binNMU some packages against current
libpcap-dev (0.9.8-3), on i386 they are:
argus
fragroute
ipgrab
karpski
lft
netdiscover
nstreams
prismstumbler
scanssh
Petr
--
To
Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Something says to me that the answer will be Sorry, too late, but is
it a possibility (time is short, I know) to have an ImageMagick
transition (with soname and package names changes)?
Why is it needed? New, regular upstream release, or something
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 11:16:51PM +, Mike Bird wrote:
On Mon June 2 2008 17:38:53 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 02/06/08 at 15:04 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
Don't create 20-day removal hints for packages with RC bugs
except when its too late for a fix to be included in the
forthcoming
gnat-4.3 is 9 of 10 days old today and therefore will become eligible for
testing tomorrow. Please unblock it so it can migrate to testing. This will
allow asis and a couple other package to migate, too. I am not planning any
further uploads of this package, unless of course something critical
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 04:16:51PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
Debian Desktop Edition for most of the release cycle.
There is no Debian Desktop Edition. Perhaps you mean the Debian Desktop
subproject?
This is a useful (but unintended) side-effect. The principal
goal remains that Testing should
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 04:27:08PM +, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Following a quick chat with Luk, and following the discussion in #484009
about the removal of update-notifier/update-manager, I want to make the
following suggestions:
- the
* Ludovic Brenta [Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:17:08 +0200]:
gnat-4.3 is 9 of 10 days old today and therefore will become eligible for
testing tomorrow. Please unblock it so it can migrate to testing. This will
allow asis and a couple other package to migate, too. I am not planning any
further uploads
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
No, tasks are not our concern directly, as it lists many packages that
any user can live without, without being hurt or even impeded. The sole
thing that matters is the priority, but packages with high priorities
are hardly leaves packages as a general rule.
Tasksel
Petr Salinger wrote:
Hello,
it looks like it would be possible to get rid of obsolete libpcap0.7.
It should be sufficient to binNMU some packages against current
libpcap-dev (0.9.8-3), on i386 they are:
binNMUs scheduled where necessary. Can the removal of the libpcap source
package be
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 04:42:22PM +, Joey Hess wrote:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
No, tasks are not our concern directly, as it lists many packages that
any user can live without, without being hurt or even impeded. The sole
thing that matters is the priority, but packages with high
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 08:08:07PM +, Joey Hess wrote:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Well in your list, there are several intersting examples. lv for
example, has many replacements. That may not have all the features of
lv, but that are a decent replacement. Moreover lv isn't _that_ known,
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Well in your list, there are several intersting examples. lv for
example, has many replacements. That may not have all the features of
lv, but that are a decent replacement. Moreover lv isn't _that_ known,
and if this task doesn't install lv, noone will be hurt. OTOH
Hi!
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:37:53 +0200
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Something says to me that the answer will be Sorry, too late, but
is it a possibility (time is short, I know) to have an ImageMagick
transition (with
Am Montag, den 02.06.2008, 09:16 -0700 schrieb Kevin B. McCarty:
Adeodato Simó wrote:
However, I'm not sure who mentioned this possibility, but shipping
/usr/lib/libexpat.so.0 within wink sounds very ugly to me.
It was me that suggested it ...
If upstream
won't update their binary,
* Daniel Leidert [Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:45:17 +0200]:
So an update of libexpat dropping the symlink should be possible now.
I'm now curious what applcation do they mean in this comment:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/expat/+bug/218963/comments/14
--
Adeodato Simó
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 484359 release.debian.org
Bug#484359: [frontend/lintian] Urgencies are case-sensitive
Bug reassigned from package `lintian' to `release.debian.org'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080603 22:24]:
No, as I've already demonstrated, it's much more complicated than that,
and removal of lots of leaf packages that you may not consider important
at all can affect tasksel and the installer in various ways.
What we should make sure then is that
17 matches
Mail list logo
