-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Within their efforts to eliminate RC bugs in testing, IMHO the release
managers should not forget that removed packages are marked as
'obsolete', eg. in aptitude.
An ordinary user who uses update-* to check for updates and who installs
other packages
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 07:03:52AM +, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Within their efforts to eliminate RC bugs in testing, IMHO the release
managers should not forget that removed packages are marked as
'obsolete', eg. in aptitude.
An ordinary user who uses update-* to check for updates and
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:54:01PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
hello,
please review for a stable release those 2 changes,
cherry picked from master
http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/etch
the Xen boot fix is needed for partial upgrades,
as
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:51:07PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
please initiate bin-NMUs for the packages depending on libc-ares1
when the new c-ares package (libc-ares2) has made it into the
archive:
What's the reason the new package name again doesn't match up with the
library's SONAME?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-04 09:59, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
We fully address [2]: a broken software, or an inadequate one is more
a problem to me than not having it in Debian. Debian is about quality,
not quantity.
I totally agree on that.
My point is that it
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:54:01PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
thanks for review, as soon as acked i'll upload to stable
with no other changes.
Please go ahead with the upload.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer
: :' :
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 05:25:23PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:37:53 +0200
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Something says to me that the answer will be Sorry, too late, but
is it a
* Philipp Kern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080604 11:33]:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:51:07PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
please initiate bin-NMUs for the packages depending on libc-ares1
when the new c-ares package (libc-ares2) has made it into the
archive:
What's the reason the new package
clone 484359 -1
reassign -1 debian-policy
retitle -1 Urgencies should all be lower case
reassign 484359 lintian
block 484359 by -1
thanks
After discussion with Joerg Jaspert, I'm of the opinion that dak is the
canonical place for valid urgencies to be set.
Thus, sending this back to lintian,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:31:22AM +, Mike Bird wrote:
On Wed June 4 2008 00:59:15 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
a broken software, or an inadequate one is more a problem to
me than not having it in Debian. Debian is about quality, not
quantity.
(1) Pierre thus asserts IMPERFECT PACKAGE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-04 16:11, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[1] search +testing +lenny on
The searches were performed without the '+' to have 'testing or lenny' etc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-03 19:59, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
It depends of your definition of usable. I don't think it's usable on
a daily basis because:
FWIW, let the users decide what they use or want to use. I took a curde
estimate by counting what the readers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 484359 -1
Bug#484359: [frontend/lintian] Urgencies are case-sensitive
Bug 484359 cloned as bug 484511.
reassign -1 debian-policy
Bug#484511: [frontend/lintian] Urgencies are case-sensitive
Bug reassigned from package `release.debian.org' to
Andreas Barth wrote:
What we should make sure then is that britney recognizes these cases,
and shows breaking task foo for that. Is there a reasonable way to
generate pseudo-packages taskel-$task that depend on all the packages
that need to be present to not break anything?
You could use the
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:54:01PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
thanks for review, as soon as acked i'll upload to stable
with no other changes.
Please go ahead with the upload.
thanks, uploaded 0.85i.
kind regards
--
maks
--
To
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 02:11:51PM +, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Arguments like
On 2008-06-04 15:34, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
(2) To a user who wishes to use a working feature of an imperfect
package, Debian is better with the imperfect package than
without: MISSING PACKAGE
Hi!
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:16:23 +0100
Neil McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any idea how many packages this will affect, and how many of these
will now FTBFS?
ImageMagick isn't famed for it's stable ABIs... :)
That is why I have asked (2+ weeks ago) the maintainers to test the
building and
Pornstarts top secret revealed. http://qsejj.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello again,
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 02:57:27PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 02:44:12PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
So bjorn.haxx.se says:
Checking cppunit
* trying to update cppunit from 1.12.0-3 to 1.12.1-1 (candidate is 98
days old)
*
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Hello again,
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 02:57:27PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 02:44:12PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
So bjorn.haxx.se says:
Checking cppunit
* trying to update cppunit from 1.12.0-3 to 1.12.1-1 (candidate is 98
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:27:22AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
I see that they are now all finished and installed. Yet the PTS for
gxmlcpp doesn't show the +b1 packages in unstable. And the haxx.se
excuses for cppunit still read as above; i.e. no mention of the +b1
21 matches
Mail list logo
