Re: libexiv2 New Upstream Release & soname bump

2008-06-21 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Mark Purcell [Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:57:15 +1000]: > > I'm planning on uploaded a new version of exiv2, which will include the > > new package libexiv2-4 (due to an soname bump) > > > Please upload to unstable now, the sooner the better. Hi Dato, Saw you

Re: d-i uses bootloaders

2008-06-21 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 21 June 2008, Joey Hess wrote: > Adeodato Simó wrote: > > yaird > > Another one missing. This breaks a small corner of d-i's UI. If yaird > is not going to be added back to testing (and looking at the BTS, I > doubt it will), we should modify d-i to not offer it as an option. It does n

Re: Planning a GNUstep transition.

2008-06-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:09:39PM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote: > Anyone from the release team want to comment on whether we will be > allowed to move forward with this transition? For my part, I was reserving comment until the list of packages came in that would require updating by hand. > On Sun

Re: d-i uses bootloaders

2008-06-21 Thread Joey Hess
Adeodato Simó wrote: > yaird Another one missing. This breaks a small corner of d-i's UI. If yaird is not going to be added back to testing (and looking at the BTS, I doubt it will), we should modify d-i to not offer it as an option. > vmelilo: m68k-only, not in testing. Of course it's fine if n

Re: d-i uses bootloaders

2008-06-21 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Joey Hess [Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:38:11 -0400]: > Frans Pop wrote: > > Jérémy posted a full list that included all these in the thread about > > #484129 and d-release was CCed in that mail: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > BTW, I've double-checked (ie, generated my own since I didn't know about > his)

Re: Please binNMU apache2-mpm-itk

2008-06-21 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Stefan Fritsch [Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:08:10 +0200]: > Hi, > please binNMU apache2-mpm-itk to build against apache2-src 2.2.9-2. > Since apache2-mpm-itk does not build-depend on apache2-prefork-dev > anymore, it is no longer necessary to wait with the binNMUs until > apache2 is built on all arc

Please binNMU apache2-mpm-itk

2008-06-21 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Hi, please binNMU apache2-mpm-itk to build against apache2-src 2.2.9-2. Since apache2-mpm-itk does not build-depend on apache2-prefork-dev anymore, it is no longer necessary to wait with the binNMUs until apache2 is built on all architectures. Thanks. Cheers, Stefan signature.asc Descriptio

Re: planning a perl upload

2008-06-21 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Monday 16 June 2008 20:00, Niko Tyni wrote: > I have a perl bugfix upload ready and I figured I'd check with you first > just in case it's a bad time for it for some reason. > > The biggest change bloats perl-base quite a bit due to UTF-8 issues > in D-I (#480533), but there seems to be no

Re: libexiv2 New Upstream Release & soname bump

2008-06-21 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Mark Purcell [Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:57:15 +1000]: Hello Mark, > I'm planning on uploaded a new version of exiv2, which will include the new > package libexiv2-4 (due to an soname bump) > Is this transition OK to proceed? Please upload to unstable now, the sooner the better. P.S.: Are you plan

Re: Upcoming libgpm transition

2008-06-21 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Guillem Jover [Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:00:48 +0300]: > Hi, Hello there again, > I've just uploaded a new upstream gpm version to experimental, it > bumps the SONAME, and this is needed to fix an RC bug(s). From the > changelog: > This will only require binNMUs. So please tell us when it'd be fine

Re: please bump movabletype-opensource (was: [Secure-testing-team] Movable Type security issue in testing)

2008-06-21 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 04:00:31AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi Dominic, > * Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-21 03:38]: > > Movable Type 4.1 has been updated to fix a security issue[1]. The version > > of Movable Type in unstable already fixes this, but since the security > > issue