request for FreeTDS library transition: libct3 -> libct4

Hi folks, This is a request to allow a long-overdue library transition for the new upstream version of FreTDS. The library in question, libct3, has the following reverse-dependencies in unstable: Package: asterisk Package: gda2-freetds Package: libdbd-freetds Package: libdbd-sybase-perl Package:

Re: libexiv2 New Upstream Release & soname bump

Mark Purcell wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: >> * Mark Purcell [Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:57:15 +1000]: >>> I'm planning on uploaded a new version of exiv2, which will include the >>> new package libexiv2-4 (due to an soname bump) >>> >> Please upload to unstable now, the sooner the be

Re: libccrtp / libzrtpcpp binNMUs

Paul Wise wrote: > Hi RMs, > > [please do not CC me, I'm subscribed] > > The obsolete packages libccrtp1-1.6-0 and libzrtpcpp-1.1-0 are depended > on by bayonne and twinkle on i386 at least. ... and are replaced by libccrtp1-1.6-1 and libzrtpcpp-1.2-0 > The following binNMUs should take care of

Re: Getting the right version of krb5 into lenny

Sam Hartman wrote: > > Hi. krb5 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-2 is currently in unstable and is on its > way towards migrating into testing. If I understand the freeze timing > correctly, it should make it before the library freeze. I think > that's good: it includes a number of useful fixes that Debian use

libccrtp / libzrtpcpp binNMUs

Hi RMs, [please do not CC me, I'm subscribed] The obsolete packages libccrtp1-1.6-0 and libzrtpcpp-1.1-0 are depended on by bayonne and twinkle on i386 at least. The following binNMUs should take care of the libccrtp/libzrtpcpp probs: libzrtpcpp_1.2.0-1, Rebuild against newer libccrtp, 1, amd64

Re: New ftgl-dev seems to cause breakage

Hi Sam, Bastian, Christian, On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:58:24AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: >> It has apparently caused breakage in a package I'm sponsoring, see >> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=root-sys

Getting the right version of krb5 into lenny

Hi. krb5 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-2 is currently in unstable and is on its way towards migrating into testing. If I understand the freeze timing correctly, it should make it before the library freeze. I think that's good: it includes a number of useful fixes that Debian users have been complaining abo

Re: New ftgl-dev seems to cause breakage

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > apparently a new API-changing version of ftgl-dev was recently > uploaded to unstable (which strikes me as a bad idea at this point!). > It has apparently caused breakage in a package I'm sponsoring, see > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg

Re: Planning a GNUstep transition.

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:37:22 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:09:39PM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote: >> Anyone from the release team want to comment on whether we will be >> allowed to move forward with this transition? > For my part, I was reserving comme

Re: d-i uses bootloaders

A new one to add to list: ixp4xx-microcode [armel] -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: New ftgl-dev seems to cause breakage

Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22/06/2008): > amd64, mipsen and sparc fails with undefined functions: > | gl/src/TGLText.cxx:88: error: 'glPushMatrix' was not declared in this scope > > gl* is part of OpenGL, not ftgl. Most likely it lacks the > include. Maybe the ftgl headers included that o

Re: New ftgl-dev seems to cause breakage

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:58:24AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > apparently a new API-changing version of ftgl-dev was recently > uploaded to unstable (which strikes me as a bad idea at this point!). No, it does not change the API. At least I was not able to find anything. > It has apparently

New ftgl-dev seems to cause breakage

Hi Release Team, apparently a new API-changing version of ftgl-dev was recently uploaded to unstable (which strikes me as a bad idea at this point!). It has apparently caused breakage in a package I'm sponsoring, see http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=root-system . Maybe this also cause

Re: d-i uses bootloaders

* Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-21 18:50]: > delo This one isn't needed for d-i since DECstations are no longer supported. I just filed a removal request for delo-installer as well. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Unblocking popt?

Hello, popt/1.14-3 would be ready for propagation to testing at the next britney run[1]. However the package is blocked, since it generates a udeb. Afaict if popt migrated, evolution-data-server would, too. This in turn would allow adeodato's hint easy libgnomeprint/2.18.4-1 gfax/0.7.6-8 to work.