For chromium, I'd rather it was let into testing before binNMUing it
(unless binNMUs don't add another 10 days to the testing migration
time). FTGL (one of it's deps) got pushed into testing without an
alpha build. So unfortunately it looks like chromium will not make the
freeze due to waiting on a
Hello,
I'm resending this email from Reinhard. We're requesting binNMUs for reverse
dependencies of openal. Our previous issue with uploading the latest version
of openal-soft has been resolved.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Please schedule binNMUs for openal -> openal-sof
Alpha team,
On 14 July 2008 at 02:43, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
| On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 07:12:33PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > r-base 2.7.1-1 is listed as 19 days old and waiting for Alpha, but has
| > seemingly been built on Alpha.
|
| "Built" means that it still isn't uploaded.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:43:34AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 07:12:33PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>r-base 2.7.1-1 is listed as 19 days old and waiting for Alpha, but has
>>seemingly been built on Alpha.
>
>"Built" means that it still isn't uploaded.
And goetz
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 07:12:33PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> r-base 2.7.1-1 is listed as 19 days old and waiting for Alpha, but has
> seemingly been built on Alpha.
"Built" means that it still isn't uploaded.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
r-base 2.7.1-1 is listed as 19 days old and waiting for Alpha, but has
seemingly been built on Alpha.
Could you please let it move into testing?
Thanks, Dirk
--
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
* Lucas Nussbaum [Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:15:34 +0200]:
> Please binNMU libinotify-ruby 0.0.2-2 on mips and mipsel.
Scheduled.
(PS, it helps a bit if people propose a concrete changelog entry to
use.)
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
Hi,
Please binNMU libinotify-ruby 0.0.2-2 on mips and mipsel.
Some libs are installed in a wrong directory because of a change between
old versions of ruby1.9 and newer versions. Apparently the mips and
mipsel packages were built against an old version.
There's no bug filed against libinotify fo
eject 2.1.5-10 is now old enough, it only waits on the upload of the
alpha binaries. Please allow it to go to testing.
Changelog:
eject (2.1.5-10) unstable; urgency=medium
* Debconf translations:
- Belarusian added. Closes: #488624
- Slovak added. Closes: #488892
* Bump Standards-Vers
On 13/07/2008 Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:49:33AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:39:14AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > > The discussion just raised again on -release. Joey got CCed in one or
> > > two mails now. Pushing with the bug on the same day is
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 01:54:46PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 04:35:38PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>please give back pgapack on amd64
>
>Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for such requests.
Will do!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 04:35:38PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> please give back pgapack on amd64
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for such requests.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:35:38 +1000]:
> please give back pgapack on amd64
> It builds with pbuilder on my amd64
Given back, build-dependencies seem installable now.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
* Paul Wise [Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:56:54 +0800]:
Hi,
> Giveback:
> gb icedtea-gcjwebplugin . i386
Done.
> DepWaits:
> (not sure how to specify these)
> icedtea-gcjwebplugin on openjdk-6-jdk (arm mips mipsel powerpc)
dw icedtea-gcjwebplugin . arm mips mipsel powerpc . -m 'openjdk-6-jdk'
Done too
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:49:33AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:39:14AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > The discussion just raised again on -release. Joey got CCed in one or
> > two mails now. Pushing with the bug on the same day is too fast. Instead
> > I like the propos
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:39:14AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> The discussion just raised again on -release. Joey got CCed in one or
> two mails now. Pushing with the bug on the same day is too fast. Instead
> I like the proposal to wait until Tuesday and then take action.
He got Cc'ed earlier a
On 11445 March 1977, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:56:11AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>> On 12/07/2008 Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> > Those two links clearly say "Its better to not have force involved" and
>> > let the maintainers agree on it. Why do you ignore that and try to force
>>
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:56:11AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> On 12/07/2008 Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Those two links clearly say "Its better to not have force involved" and
> > let the maintainers agree on it. Why do you ignore that and try to force
> > it now, not giving the maintainers any time
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 01:03:19PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> please hint together poco clamfs
Easy hint added.
Neil
--
< weasel> sigill: change 149EUR to USD
-!- sigill [EMAIL PROTECTED] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
< weasel> does that mean the dollar is crashing?
19 matches
Mail list logo
