Re: Small set of hints for ready to go packages

Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello RM team, > > Here goes a small set of hints that could be added if noone from RM > team has concerns with them: > > unblock cpuburn > unblock debootstrap > unblock freetype > unblock gtk2-engines > unblock ttf-indic-fonts all unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSC

Small set of hints for ready to go packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello RM team, Here goes a small set of hints that could be added if noone from RM team has concerns with them: unblock cpuburn unblock debootstrap unblock freetype unblock gtk2-engines unblock ttf-indic-fonts Cheers, - -- O T A V I OS

Re: Please upload 'r-base on alpha' build (Re: Please hint or push r-base 2.7.1-1 into testing)

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 08:11:17AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >Is there an expected resolution for restoring alpha uploads ? http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=r-base r-base_2.7.1-1_alpha is installed now. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[SRM] stable upload for licq?

licq in stable is currently unusable due to server-side changes (see bug #488934). The patch is trivial and I have confirmed that it applies to the stable version and works. The question now is where to upload to? Is this ok for a stable point release? Or should this go into volatile instead? For

Re: Please schedule binNMUs for openal -> openal-soft transition

* Paul Wise [Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:07:07 +0800]: > (unless binNMUs don't add another 10 days to the testing migration > time) They don't per se, but if their purpose is a transition, they just tie you into it instead... -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es D

Re: Please unblock eject

Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > eject 2.1.5-10 is now old enough, it only waits on the upload of the > alpha binaries. Please allow it to go to testing. unblocked, still waiting on alpha though. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Re: status of default syslog daemon for lenny

Andreas Barth wrote: * Michael Biebl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080712 03:23]: I'm not entirely sure, what you expect from me or Joey. This topic was already discussed at length a few months ago [1] with a broad consent afaict that switching to rsyslog would be a good idea. Some issues were raised,

Re: Fwd: Please schedule binNMUs for openal -> openal-soft transition

Andres Mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/07/2008): > blender_2.46+dfsg-2 A sourceful upload happened already: blender_2.46+dfsg-3 (like some hours ago). Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#490819: release.debian.org: section 5(m) of lenny RC policy out of date

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 03:31:13PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Quoting from http://release.debian.org/lenny/rc_policy.txt: > 5. General > [...] > (m) X support > > [...] > > Packages must not install files in to /usr/{bin,include,lib}/X11, > ho

Re: BinNMUs for all packages that built with libglib2.0-dev (= 2.16.4-1)

Hi, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > please schedule binNMUs for all packages that built with libglib2.0-dev > (= 2.16.4-1) on big endian architectures. that means for openoffice.org: dw openoffice.org . powerpc mips sparc s390 . -m 'libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.16.4-2)' gb openoffice.org . powerpc mips sparc s

Bug#490819: release.debian.org: section 5(m) of lenny RC policy out of date

Package: release.debian.org Quoting from http://release.debian.org/lenny/rc_policy.txt: 5. General [...] (m) X support [...] Packages must not install files in to /usr/{bin,include,lib}/X11, however, they should reference the files by these names in preference to the c

Re: Please upload 'r-base on alpha' build (Re: Please hint or push r-base 2.7.1-1 into testing)

On 14 July 2008 at 08:26, Steve Langasek wrote: | On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 08:42:06PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Alpha team, | | > On 14 July 2008 at 02:43, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: | > | On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 07:12:33PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > | > | > r-base 2.7.1-1 is

BinNMUs for all packages that built with libglib2.0-dev (= 2.16.4-1)

Hi, please schedule binNMUs for all packages that built with libglib2.0-dev (= 2.16.4-1) on big endian architectures. This version of GLib had a bug, caused by changed behaviour of AC_C_BIGENDIAN in autoconf 2.62, that resulted in #define G_BYTE_ORDER G_LITTLE_ENDIAN in glibconfig.h. As this ma

please give-back/retry petsc 2.3.3-14 on arm

please give-back/retry petsc 2.3.3-14 on arm signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please unblock eject

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > eject 2.1.5-10 is now old enough, it only waits on the upload of the > alpha binaries. Please allow it to go to testing. No objection - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R -

We provide you with a cost effective, convenient way of shopping for health items online.

Dont get lost in her eyes because of small dimensions. http://biuy.wellnesssurgical.eu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please upload 'r-base on alpha' build (Re: Please hint or push r-base 2.7.1-1 into testing)

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 08:42:06PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Alpha team, > On 14 July 2008 at 02:43, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > | On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 07:12:33PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > > | > r-base 2.7.1-1 is listed as 19 days old and waiting for Alpha, but has > | > see