On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 05:39:44PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> 1) debian/patches/302_vim_selinux_support: Add SE Linux support to vipw/vigr.
> Thanks to Russell Coker. Closes: #491907
[...]
> 1) was mentioned as "the most important functional issue that needs to be
>fixed for SE Li
hello debian-release,
I'd like to request a freeze exception for cryptsetup 1.0.6-4. I didn't
upload it to unstable yet, but if no objections are raised, I'll do so
tomorrow.
at least one change (to use askpass in the init script) is very likely
to fix several issues, among others a security bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/08 18:41, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:07:25PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>>> That's just adding an arbitrary 5 days delay. Uploading to experimental
>>> won't uncover new issues, because nobody uses packages in ex
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> The inn2 package has been compiled against libdb-dev 4.7, so it cannot
> transition to unstable. What should I do? Can it be binNMU'ed?
Well, it can not migrate because it was compiled against libdb4.7-dev,
so changing the build dependency to libdb-dev or libdb4.6-dev should
Please unblock:
build-essential, adding armel support
gcc-defaults, fixing a dangling symlink
gcc-3.3, re-adding libstdc++5 for powerpc
gdc-4.2, once it is built on all archs, fixing a RC report
I intend to ask for a unblock of gcc-4.3, once it is built on all
architectures. I would like
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-24 17:31]:
> * Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-23 23:03]:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:08:02 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> >
> > > Please, give back octave3.0/3.0.1-6 on sparc. The autobuild failed with a
> > > cryptic messa
Hi,
I'd like to request an unblock hint for xorg-server:
unblock xorg-server/2:1.4.2-2
This version fixes some parallel build issues in the packaging, and
cherry-picks 3 bug fixes from upstream.
There'll be at least one further upload before release, we have some
pending debconf translation upda
Nicolas François wrote:
> Dear Debian Release Managers,
>
> Before uploading to unstable, I would like to know if you would allow a
> new release of shadow.
Yes, looks reasonable: please upload.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Dear Debian Release Managers,
Before uploading to unstable, I would like to know if you would allow a
new release of shadow.
Here is the relevant changelog:
shadow (1:4.1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* The "Morbier" release.
1) debian/patches/302_vim_selinux_support: Add SE Linux support to vip
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:20, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Sandro Tosi [Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:47:00 +0200]:
>> Thanks for clarifying this! I would have asked sooner or later if you
>> hadn't said explicitly. Do you think worth write some sort of FAQ
>> about these things, a document
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:16:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#474322: fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #474322,
regarding RM: glimpse/stable RoSRM; license problem
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:17:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#481231: fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #481231,
regarding RM: maxdb-7.5.00/stable -- ROST; Unfixable security bug, upstream
went non-free
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:17:58 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475088: fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #475088,
regarding RM: dcc/stable -- ROST; Upstream requests removal, security issues,
upstream went non-free
to be marked as done.
This mean
The inn2 package has been compiled against libdb-dev 4.7, so it cannot
transition to unstable. What should I do? Can it be binNMU'ed?
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Matthew Rosewarne wrote:
> Elizabeth Bevilacqua and I have been planning a BSP in Philadelphia on August
> 2nd. We would like to coordinate with the release team (as recommended in
> the
> last release update) to achieve maximum squashery. It would be great to get
> the word out about the
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:27:25PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> New package atl2-etchnhalf:
> architectures in updates: s390 all amd64 i386 powerpc arm sparc alpha ia64
> mips mipsel hppa
> version in updates: 2.0.3-3~etchnhalf.1
> Rationales:
> - 2.0.3-3~etchnhalf.1: atl2-etchnhalf - source
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> please unblock apache2 2.2.9-6 and hint it into testing with
> apache2-mpm-itk.
I was waiting till apache2-mpm-itk binNMUs got uploaded on all release
archs and apparently so were you :-)
hint + unblock hint added
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Elizabeth Bevilacqua and I have been planning a BSP in Philadelphia on August
2nd. We would like to coordinate with the release team (as recommended in the
last release update) to achieve maximum squashery. It would be great to get
the word out about the event, though I will need to know rough
Hi,
I hear that
> Release schedule
>
> Next week
> Full freeze
> Please don't wait with uploads for the last day before the freeze,
> thanks.
>
> September 2008
> Release lenny!
I would like to update my package debian-reference-en to mention new
codename for testin
19 matches
Mail list logo
