Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:32:49PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Please allow gnucash 2.2.6-2 into testing; this has a minimally invasive
patch to avoid a dangerous data-loss bug in an unusual usage case.
(It turns out that sshfs returns ENOSYS on a link call. This is wildly
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:44:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Given that sshfs's errno return is wildly wrong,
The errors are not wrong. The lists in the documentation are not
terminal.
The open group spec say[1]:
| The ERRORS section on each page specifies whether an error will be returned,
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:24:55AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:44:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Given that sshfs's errno return is wildly wrong,
The errors are not wrong. The lists in the documentation are not
terminal.
The open group spec say[1]:
| The
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 09:24 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:44:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Given that sshfs's errno return is wildly wrong,
The errors are not wrong. The lists in the documentation are not
terminal.
The open group spec say[1]:
| The ERRORS
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 00:32 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
EPERM The file system containing oldpath and newpath does not support
the creation of hard links.
That seems to cover any case where the kernel might return ENOSYS...
Yes, but this is not glibc's responsibility;
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:38:14AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 00:32 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
EPERM The file system containing oldpath and newpath does not
support
the creation of hard links.
That seems to cover any case where the
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 00:48 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
FWIW, I know there have been other cases in the past where glibc has handled
ENOSYS returns for unimplemented syscalls and fallen back to older,
less-preferred interfaces to avoid returning ENOSYS to the caller for a case
where the
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:32:15AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:24:55AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
And which value should they be mapped to?
EPERM The file system containing oldpath and newpath does not support
the creation of hard links.
Hi,
it seems to me that sendxmpp is not of release:
The two RC bugs
496823 Does not work at all
497829 Syntax for specifying the connection host does not work
have patches, but the important bug
427162 Not XMPP compliant with Authen::SASL::Cyrus
aka
427231 MUST not send default
Hi,
please allow control-center/1:2.22.2.1-2 into lenny. It fixes a display
bug that shows up in non-UTF8 locales now that libxklavier correctly
returns UTF8.
control-center (1:2.22.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* 02_xklavier_utf8.patch: patch from upstream to accommodate the UTF8
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1311 files changed, 172664 insertions(+), 35937 deletions(-)
There is even more change uploaded on:
http://jspoker.pokersource.info/packaging-farm/jpoker/gnulinux/debian/unstable/src/
Let me know what I can do in
* Luk Claes [Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:01:52 +0200]:
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008 17:52, Luk Claes wrote:
It would be a pity if jifty will not be in lenny while near 20 new
needed dependencies were added for jifty and they will be almost useless
without it.
No, sorry, in
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 10:37 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:32:15AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:24:55AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
And which value should they be mapped to?
EPERM The file system containing oldpath and newpath
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 10:40 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:38:14AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Yes, but this is not glibc's responsibility; it is the kernel's. and, i
think the kernel should pass back the error it gets too. it is sshfs
which should do the
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:51:38AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:33:00PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
+1021_new-style_firewire.patch
etch+half kernel has old ieee1394, no need for that one.
Thanks for your
Hi,
On Sep 12 10:24, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
it seems to me that sendxmpp is not of release:
The two RC bugs
496823 Does not work at all
497829 Syntax for specifying the connection host does not work
These patches look simple enough to include them for lenny.
have patches, but the
Hi!
I have sponsored the upload of libtrash_2.4-2, which fixes RC bug
#488467, a reproducible segfault in amd64.
I see that libtrash was removed from testing last week. I had the diff
from the maintainer to do the upload since the 5th, but due to various
reasons couldn't do it until today.
* Stefan Fritsch [Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:58:12 +0200]:
Hi,
please binNMU apache2-mpm-itk in unstable with dep-wait on apache2-src
2.2.9-9.
Scheduled. (Since apache2-src is arch:all, no dep-wait is needed at
all.)
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at
On 12/09/08 at 18:19 +0200, Andreas Putzo wrote:
Makes it very doubtful that is is of release quality. In fact, I wonder
whether it'd be good to raise #427231 to RC as well.
sendxmpp is a nice tool to easily send messages from scripts or
commandline and i'm not aware of a good alternative
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 06:19:09PM +0200, Andreas Putzo wrote:
sendxmpp is a nice tool to easily send messages from scripts or
commandline and i'm not aware of a good alternative in debian.
If no one objects i would prepare a nmu and reassign 427162 to
libnet-xmpp-perl.
Please NMU.
20 matches
Mail list logo
