Hi,
I just uploaded version 1.2-7 of isight-firmware-tools.
It fiexes the problem that an error was not output to be similar
when there was a problem on a pass of the firmware and README.Debian
was too old.[0][1]
And I updated po-debconf because debconf template changed by fixing
this problem.
Dear Release Managers,
I would request you to please unblock pkpgcounter 3.50-3. It includes
a small fix for an "important" bug, along with lots of unobtrusive
(mostly cosmetic) Debian specific changes.
Thank you.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
This is a sid-only issue.
Please binNMU the following packages on i386 and amd64, in this order:
haskell-happs-util
haskell-happs-data
haskell-happs-state
haskell-happs-ixset
haskell-happs-server
Each one build-depends on the previous and the last one will close
#507631. HAppS is currently unins
Hi
as the subject says, we are planning to increase the frequency of
dinstall[1] runs. Our current plan is to have 4 runs a day, switching
From the current [07|19]:52 schedule to the new [01|07|13|19]:52
schedule. All times are in UTC.
For the mirror network, this means two more pushes a day, but
Hello,
recently some version checks between suites got enabled in dak. This is
good, because we've been suffering several cases of "maintainer gets
t-p-u version wrong, and then ftpmaster needs to come and help". With a
version check in place that prevents uploads to t-p-u whose version is
greater
Er, a conclusion was missing:
=> Rejects based on version checks should only happen for source
uploads; for binary uploads, the checks should result in "no op",
or in a propagation to another suite.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian De
On 2008-12-04 21:17 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for some reason, the etch->lenny upgrade results in epic fail when using
> aptitude, because random X driver packages get removed.
At least if one accepts the first solution offered by aptitude, the
subsequent ones are usually better.
>
> (Bcc: clamav maintainers for the P.S. below.)
>
Don't see a need to BCC, moved to CC, no secrets seen in here.
[...]
>
>
> Clamav P.S.: Was using 0.94.dfsg.1-1 instead of 0.94.1.dfsg-1 on purpose
> or just a mistake?
>
Well, the mistake happened at the time of choosing 0.94.dfsg as a versio
Hi,
for some reason, the etch->lenny upgrade results in epic fail when using
aptitude, because random X driver packages get removed.
I'm not quite sure why it does that, but one candidate explanation is
the circular dependency between xserver-xorg, xserver-xorg-core and all
X drivers. Does someo
It was discovered that Tkabber [1], a GUI client for XMPP (Jabber)
instant messaging protocol, was affected by a bug in the implementation
of the STARTTLS protocol (an ability to upgrade a TCP stream to TLS) in
Google Talk XMPP servers. Under certain circumstances, this bug prevents
XMPP client
(Bcc: clamav maintainers for the P.S. below.)
* Steffen Joeris [Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:32:48 +0100]:
> Hi
Hi,
> cups 1.3.8-1lenny4
> p3nfs 5.19-1.2
> valgrind 1:3.3.1-3
> iceape 1.1.13-1
> clamav 0.94.dfsg.2-1
Done.
> tkman 2.2-4
> wordpress 2.5.1-11
> flamethrower 0.1.8-2
Already requested by
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 05:03:44PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:57:50AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> > clone 361346 -1
> > reopen -1
> > reassign -1 release.debian.org
> > retitle -1 RM: astro
Thanks a lot!
2008/12/4 Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please reupload hlbr 1.6-2 to testing-proposed-updates as 1.6-2~lenny1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Frans Pop [Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:21:49 +0100]:
> The current version in testing is outdated (matches D-I beta2); the new
> one matches D-I RC1 and what's currently published on the website.
> So please:
> unblock installation-guide/20081113
> I will probably do one more upload in the next week
* Eriberto [Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:39:07 -0200]:
> I am the HLBR maintainer. I asked the liberation of the package to
> migrate to Lenny. The package was unlocked but depends of the pcre3 to
> migrate from Sid to Lenny. I would like to know how to proceed to have
> my package in Testing. Must I repac
* Thomas Mueller [Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:13:33 +0100]:
> Hi,
> I am the Maintainer of the quassel packages.
> Due to the fact that the current package in lenny is totally out dated, I'd
> like to ask you to remove the package from lenny.
> Why?
> The lenny-package contains 0.2~rc1, which is just
* Francois Marier [Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:14:15 +1300]:
> (please CC me on your replies, thanks!)
> Hello,
> I have uploaded a new version of docvert which fixes a minor security
> problem with it.
> The Testing Security team will not issue an advisory, but given the size of
> the change (deleting
* Christian Perrier [Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:17:42 +0100]:
> Dear release managers,
> I recently NMU'ed (or worked with the maintainer of) gosa to fix
> some pending l10n bugs.
> Could you consider unblocking that version and allow it to enter testing?
Unblocked.
--
Adeodato Simó
* Christian Perrier [Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:17:10 +0100]:
> Dear release managers,
> I recently NMU'ed (or worked with the maintainer of) ppp to fix
> some pending l10n bugs.
> Could you consider unblocking that version and allow it to enter testing?
Unblocked.
--
Adeodato Simó
* Frederik Schüler [Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:11:19 +0100]:
> Hi!
> before having my iscsitarget getting stuck in unstable, I want to ask first
> here: should I fix http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506588
> for lenny or wait until the release?
Already replied to on IRC.
--
Adeodato
* Riccardo Stagni [Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:36:22 +0100]:
> Dear release team,
> I'm asking for unblocking gcx/0.9.11-4 to fix a bug present in all
> previous versions on 64 bit architectures.
> gcx (0.9.11-4) unstable; urgency=high
> * RC bugfix picked from upstream cvs (segfaults on 64-bit system
* Michael Meskes [Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:02:09 +0100]:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:44:09PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > As you can see there only two "features", logevent and pidfile but quite
> > > some
> > > fixes. So the question is shall we backport the bug fixes to 1.0.6 or do
> > > you
> >
* Guus Sliepen [Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:35:11 +0100]:
> It fixes a grave bug (#505348) which causes all previous versions to fail to
> work.
Ok, let's unblock it.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato a
Dear release team,
I'm asking for unblocking gcx/0.9.11-4 to fix a bug present in all
previous versions on 64 bit architectures.
gcx (0.9.11-4) unstable; urgency=high
* RC bugfix picked from upstream cvs (segfaults on 64-bit systems)
(Closes: #507667)
-- Riccardo Stagni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Please unblock the following packages:
cups 1.3.8-1lenny4
clamav 0.94.dfsg.2-1
flamethrower 0.1.8-2
quassel 0.2~rc1-1.1
tkman 2.2-4
valgrind 1:3.3.1-3
wordpress 2.5.1-11
p3nfs 5.19-1.2
iceape 1.1.13-1
More information are available here[0].
Cheers
Steffen
[0]: http://security-tracker.debian
* Martin Pitt [Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:42:30 -0800]:
> Hello release team,
> I just uploaded a new cups which fixes a security bug, adds a CVE to
> the 1.3.8-1 changelog, and nothing else. Please allow it into testing.
> Steffen Joeris kindly took the task to provide an upload for
> etch-security.
* Nico Golde [Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:43:10 +0100]:
> - wordpress
Unblocked.
> - tkman
> - flamethrower
Unblocked, and set age-days to 5.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
* Moritz Muehlenhoff [Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:27:17 +0100]:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 06:36:24PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > verlihub has one of those pesky security bugs without response for a week.
> > It's not in stable.
> > It's not too popular.
> > How about removing the pressure o
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 01:58:51AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 07:49:56AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:17:43AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > bind9 in lenny has several problems with ACL parsing. Emmanuel Bouthenot
> > > investigated t
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 06:36:24PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> verlihub has one of those pesky security bugs without response for a week.
> It's not in stable.
> It's not too popular.
> How about removing the pressure on the maintainer to fix it for lenny?
It's been nearly two weeks n
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:57:50AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> clone 361346 -1
> reopen -1
> reassign -1 release.debian.org
> retitle -1 RM: astrolog/stable -- RoQA; orphaned long time, non-free,
> contains potentially
* Josselin Mouette [Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:52:56 +0100]:
> Le dimanche 30 novembre 2008 à 10:15 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> > It seems the OMF files that were generated by rarian-compat in the
> > gnome-hearts build are not suitable for scrollkeeper. So this a but in
> > rarian-compat: if the
* LI Daobing (李道兵) [Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:11:05 +0800]:
> chmsee_1.0.2-1, fix not installable fix #50, 1, i386
> binnmu please, thanks.
Scheduled, closing the bug.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer ad
* Daniel Baumann [Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:02:45 +0100]:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Thanks, please upload.
> done.
Unblocked.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Man is certainly stark
* Josselin Mouette [Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:15:55 +0100]:
> Le lundi 01 décembre 2008 à 01:10 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> > > Indeed. For devhelp that also means binNMUs to testing once xulrunner
> > > has migrated, since 0.21-2 is not going to migrate.
> > It'd be great if somebody could reply
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
>> You are replacing an unsigned type by a signed type (several
>> occurrences). Is that intentional?
>
> This fix is from upstream.
> I can confirm with him if you would like to.
Better confirm with upstream than introduce new, subtle bugs
Hi Julien!
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:39:00 +0100
Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +-unsigned int i;
> > ++int32_t i;
>
> You are replacing an unsigned type by a signed type (several
> occurrences). Is that intentional?
This f
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> +-unsigned int i;
> ++int32_t i;
You are replacing an unsigned type by a signed type (several
occurrences). Is that intentional?
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Public key available
Hi!
About #503820, do you think that it's OK (and allow me) to upload a fix
to unstable (targeted at Lenny), fixing it, please?
The changes:
diff -u pngtools-0.3/debian/changelog pngtools-0.3/debian/changelog
--- pngtools-0.3/debian/changelog
+++ pngtools-0.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+pn
Le lundi 01 décembre 2008 à 01:10 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> > Indeed. For devhelp that also means binNMUs to testing once xulrunner
> > has migrated, since 0.21-2 is not going to migrate.
>
> It'd be great if somebody could reply to this message when xulrunner has
> migrated.
Here we go: x
chmsee_1.0.2-1, fix not installable fix #50, 1, i386
binnmu please, thanks.
--
Best Regards,
LI Daobing
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> retitle 184140 excuses: please encode URLs containing plus signs
Bug#184140: qa.debian.org: Please encode URLs containing plus signs
Changed Bug title to `excuses: please encode URLs
Le dimanche 30 novembre 2008 à 10:15 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> It seems the OMF files that were generated by rarian-compat in the
> gnome-hearts build are not suitable for scrollkeeper. So this a but in
> rarian-compat: if the source files are incorrect (which is likely since
> this does
Hi,
I would like to request unblock ldns 1.4.0-1. Unfortunately
version 1.3.0-1 which is in testing contains several critical
bugs.
Some tools doesn't work at all:
ldns-signzone (http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=210)
ldns-read-zone (http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=213)
l
44 matches
Mail list logo
