Re: Live 5.0.0 i386 is maybe not i386

Richard & Frans, thanks for the info -- yes, it is pretty old hardware, but the Internet does record success with it using Debian, only I expect that means I will need to find a comparable vintage debian ;) I've been going down the list of old-hardware distros at distrowatch, 6 so far, 5 have fai

Re: please approve / unblock libpng/1.2.35-1 (it has a udeb)

Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:39:52PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:47:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >>> Otavio Salvador wrote: Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes: > please approve / unblock libpng/1.2.35-1 > Closes:

Re: please push gparted 0.3.9-3

Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:22:22PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >> https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?p=gparted >> >> gparted 0.3.9-3 listed as built at the page above. >> >> Could someone get it to change its status from built to installed?

Re: ode 0.11 transition

* Gonéri Le Bouder [Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:13:58 +0100]: > Hi, Hello, > Can I upload libode 0.11 in unstable. It has a SO version with these Yes, please upload. > This package comes with libode-dev which provide libode0-dev. I'll > ask for binNMU against those packges when it'll be in unstable.

Re: please approve / unblock libpng/1.2.35-1 (it has a udeb)

On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:39:52PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:47:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >>Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes: >>> please approve / unblock libpng/1.2.35-1 >>> Closes: 486415 516256 Changes: libpng

Re: please push gparted 0.3.9-3

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:22:22PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?p=gparted > >gparted 0.3.9-3 listed as built at the page above. > >Could someone get it to change its status from built to installed? > >Thank you. No help from sp...@buildd.

Re: [Pkg-mythtv-maintainers] toolame: remove from unstable, update in stable

On Sunday 15 March 2009 22:19:14 Luk Claes wrote: > > 2. Provide an empty toolame package that depends on twolame. > > Preferably in the twolame source package. As the current twolame maintainer. I would be happy with this approach. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed me

Re: Live 5.0.0 i386 is maybe not i386

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:37:09AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > But the *live CD* is NOT Debian Installer!!! Oh, of course, thanks for clarifying! How could I miss that in the original post... %-/ Richard -- __ _ |_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key: 888354F7 | \/¯| http://atterer.n

Re: very late freeze exception for texlive-extra 2007.dfsg.16-1

On So, 15 Mär 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > > dget > > http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/proposed-updates/texlive-extra_2007.dfsg.17-1~lenny01.dsc > > > > Should I upload them straight away or does anyone want to check first? > > Please upload. Done. Please inform us if there have been any pro

Re: please unblock reiser4progs/1.0.7-2

Felix Zielcke wrote: > Hello, > > please unblock reiser4progs 1.0.7-2. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: libarchive-tar-perl oldstable update for CVE-2007-4829

Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * Gunnar Wolf [2009-03-13 23:47]: > [...] >>> This is Debian bug #449544. >>> >>> Unfortunately the vulnerability described above is not important enough >>> to get it fixed via regular security update in Debian oldstable. It does >>> not warrant a DSA. >>> >>> However i

Re: munin: unblock request for stable-proposed-updates

Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > please unblock munin 1.2.6-10~lenny1 for stable-proposed-updates, it fixes an > important yet trivial bug with cgi graphing (#514634) and fixes a trivial > regex in the netstat plugin (#507069)). Ok, should get included in the next point release. Cheers Luk --

Re: toolame: remove from unstable, update in stable

Fabian Greffrath wrote: > However, I think the toolame package in stable may stay both for the > convenience of our users and because it's not *that* bad after all. I > have prepared a package targeted at Lenny that fixes two portability > bugs and some minor lintian warnings. It can be found at

Re: very late freeze exception for texlive-extra 2007.dfsg.16-1

Norbert Preining wrote: > Dear Luk, Hi Norbert > On So, 22 Feb 2009, Luk Claes wrote: >> Indeed, uploading a version to sid and one with a lower version to >> proposed-updates. > > Ok, we have in sid 2007.dfsg.17-1 and I have prepare 2007.dfsg.17-1~lenny01 > I hope that is fine as version goes.

Re: flpsed stable update required

Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: >> The (tiny) patch that fixes this is enclosed. Please let me know if >> it is OK to upload 0.5.1-2 with this patch to "stable". > > Following discussions with vorlon on #debian-devel I am uploading > this

Re: libcgi-application-plugins-perl for lenny r1? (fwd)

Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > I thought I had sent this out a couple of days ago but apparently not > but in case you are seeing this twice, sorry. Oh and please Cc me on > replies. > >> Bug #470890 reported that the CGI::Application::Plugin::ActionDispatch >> perl module in libcgi-application-plugins-

Re: stable update for sbnc 1.2-8

Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Hello, > > please accept my stable sbnc update. It fixes the awaited location of > the key file for SSL support (from /usr/sbin/sbnc.key to > /etc/sbnc/sbnc.key). The last path is also mentioned in the docs, seems > like I lost a patch in the past.. > > It fixes this bug:

Re: Some gb and dw for octave3.0 and h5utils

* Rafael Laboissiere [Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:00:38 +0100]: > gb octave3.0_1:3.0.4~rc5-2 . armel s390 > dw h5utils_1.10-7.1 . armel hppa ia64 . -m 'octave3.0 (>= 1:3.0.4~rc5-2)' > gb h5utils_1.10-7.1 . mips powerpc Done that with some adjustements. -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. --

Re: Live 5.0.0 i386 is maybe not i386

On Sunday 15 March 2009, Richard Atterer wrote: > Even if this had not been done, installation might still have failed on > that machine because the Debian installer needs quite a bit of RAM. > claims 44 > MB, but again I think the figure

Re: Live 5.0.0 i386 is maybe not i386

[CCd to -release - is the release manual up to date?] Hi Gary, On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:29:46PM -0400, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote: > I just downloaded > http://debian.yorku.ca/debian-cd/5.0.0-live/i386/iso-cd/ and tried an > install on a 1998-vintage Compaq Presario 1210; the Live boot fails on

Re: ode 0.11 transition

OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du dimanche 15 mars 2009, vers 00:13, Gonéri Le Bouder disait : > python-soya [...] > python-soya There is a version in unstable and one in experimental. Once you upload new ode, I will upload the experimental version to unstable. -- BOFH excuse #195: We only su