Re: upcoming point releases

2009-03-22 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Josselin Mouette writes: > Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 20:26 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit : >> Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or >> less up-to-date status of the preparations. > > The installer team requested that gtk

Re: approval for openoffice.org 1:2.4.1+dfsg-1 for s-p-u

2009-03-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Philipp Kern wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:47:34PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > * debian/control.in: > > > - build-conflict against g++-4.3 (>> 4.3.2-1.1) (reason: #514839) > > > > Um, I don't like that. For one: what happens when g++ is upda

Please remove powershell and soundtracker from testing

2009-03-22 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
gnome-libs has been removed from unstable. Please remove the two remaining packages using it from testing: powershell and soundtracker RC bugs are in place so that they can't migrate back before they've been fixed. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.

Re: upcoming point releases

2009-03-22 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 20:26 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit : > Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or > less up-to-date status of the preparations. The installer team requested that gtk+ 2.12.12 made it soon enough for the d-i update, but I see it is still pending.

Re: upcoming point releases

2009-03-22 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-03-22 20:26, Luk Claes wrote: > @jens+debacle: Can you please try to have the Release Notes as > up-to-date as possible, TIA? These days are busy for me. Any help very much appreciated! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

upcoming point releases

2009-03-22 Thread Luk Claes
Hi The upcoming point releases for both Etch and Lenny are planned for April 4th. Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or less up-to-date status of the preparations. Security updates that are complete could still make it till after March 28th, though this has to b

Re: [SRM] 2nd update for samba packages in lenny

2009-03-22 Thread Luk Claes
Christian Perrier wrote: > Dear Stable Release Managers, > > After a first upload which you approved and entered s-p-u, we (Samba > package maintainers) would like to upload a second update for packages > in lenny. > > This update's changelog is: > > samba (2:3.2.5-4lenny2) stable-proposed-updat

Re: Bug#520713: init script start hangs (request for stable update)

2009-03-22 Thread Roger Leigh
tags 520713 + fixed-upstream patch pending thanks On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:54:52AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > Package: schroot > Version: 1.2.1-1 > Severity: critical > > On goetz (our alpha buildd) the init script's start action hangs, causing the > system to not boot up cleanly. Followi

[SRM] 2nd update for samba packages in lenny

2009-03-22 Thread Christian Perrier
Dear Stable Release Managers, After a first upload which you approved and entered s-p-u, we (Samba package maintainers) would like to upload a second update for packages in lenny. This update's changelog is: samba (2:3.2.5-4lenny2) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low * Do not abort rename pr

Re: Bug#503992: Request of authorisation for an upload of Snort in stable to fix 503992

2009-03-22 Thread Florian Weimer
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña: >> It's probably a security bug on its own, so it probably should go >> through the DSA process, even though the bug was introduced through >> t-p-u before the lenny release. > > Since Neil answered already I uploaded the packages to stable using the patch > I sen

Re: Bug#503992: Request of authorisation for an upload of Snort in stable to fix 503992

2009-03-22 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 03:39:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Luk Claes: > > Any reason why this regression caused by a security upload, should not > > be fixed by a security upload (I've put the Security Team in Cc)? No reason, I just thought this would not be considered a security bug. >

Re: Request of authorisation for an upload of Snort in stable to fix 503992

2009-03-22 Thread Florian Weimer
* Luk Claes: >> I would like to make an upload to stable to fix bug 503992 of Snort. Basicly, >> this bug was introduced with the patch for a security vulnerability but >> introduced a sigsegv due to an improper call to a function. This error kills >> the Snort IDS as soon as it receives fragmente

Re: Request of authorisation for an upload of Snort in stable to fix 503992

2009-03-22 Thread Luk Claes
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > Hi release team, Hi Javier > I would like to make an upload to stable to fix bug 503992 of Snort. Basicly, > this bug was introduced with the patch for a security vulnerability but > introduced a sigsegv due to an improper call to a function. This error kil

Re: ImageMagick upload to stable, replacing non-free fonts (#510751)

2009-03-22 Thread Neil McGovern
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:45:14PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Hi! > > ImageMagick in Lenny has non-free fonts with it (see bug #510751). > The proposed update is to upload the current version in testing Please upload. Neil -- irssiproxy appears to be crack cut with washing up powder

Re: Please unblock shorewall-{common,perl,shell}

2009-03-22 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:49:50PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > It appears that shorewall-{common,perl,shell} are in need of hinting in > order to propogate. I'd appreciate if someone could hint them. > easy hint added. Neil -- [..] Debian (in the form of a large, busy, and frequently st