Hi,
Can openssl 0.9.8g-16 be hinted to testing?
It fixes a security issue.
It has a udeb.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
* Nelson A. de Oliveira [Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:39:10 -0300]:
> Perfect! We are going to wait for the green light.
Green light for unstable!
--
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory and Lorelai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:48:15PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bug #509930 makes nss crash on sparc (as reported on our BTS) and ia64
> (as reported upstream). It has the bad side effect to make iceweasel and
> anything using nss OCSP check. I'm currently uploading a fix to unstable,
Hi,
Bug #509930 makes nss crash on sparc (as reported on our BTS) and ia64
(as reported upstream). It has the bad side effect to make iceweasel and
anything using nss OCSP check. I'm currently uploading a fix to unstable,
but I think it would be a good thing to have this fix in stable, too.
You'l
Steve M. Robbins (06/04/2009):
> I expect that a binary NMU for amd64 will solve the problem.
The -dev package is Architecture: all, so you'll need a sourceful upload
AFAICT.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:58:43PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Testing watch mails are sent out once a day (at 16h UTC). The transition
> just missed it by a couple hours, so it’ll get sent in today’s run.
> Phil, is it cheap enough that we could run it after each dinstall?
In order not to spam
* Felipe Sateler [Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:58:23 +1100]:
> > * plan for libjack0.100.0-0: there are 11 source packages left with
> > dependencies on this old library. No sourceful uploads are needed
> > for this: once you’ve gotten back to me that the plan is good, I
> > will provide you with
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:33:29PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I guess migrating ocaml to testing can now be considered...
> This is now done:
> ocaml | 3.11.0-5 | testing
> ocaml | 3.11.0-5 | unstable
>
> Congratulations for making of this transition one of the less painful
> I’ve ever
On 06-04-2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Stéphane Glondu [Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:01:35 +0200]:
>
>> Adeodato Simó a écrit :
>> >> Please schedule the attached requests for the OCaml 3.11.0 transition.
>
>> > Scheduled, with the glitches noted below. Please get back to us with the
>> > needed wanna-bui
* Rafael Laboissiere [Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:52:28 +0200]:
> Thanks, I see it is already there:
> http://packages.debian.org/source/testing/libmtp
> I am just curious, why there was no mail notification generated by Debian
> testing watch?
Testing watch mails are sent out once a day (at 16h U
* Adeodato Simó [2009-04-05 21:53]:
> * Rafael Laboissiere [Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:21:51 +0200]:
>
> > Done:
>
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2009/04/msg00251.html
>
> Thanks, I pushed the transition now.
Thanks, I see it is already there:
http://packages.debian.org/so
* Stéphane Glondu [Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:01:35 +0200]:
> Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> >> Please schedule the attached requests for the OCaml 3.11.0 transition.
> > Scheduled, with the glitches noted below. Please get back to us with the
> > needed wanna-build actions.
> All packages that needed recom
* Michael Biebl [Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:03:40 +0200]:
> Hi!
Hello!
> Adeodato Simó schrieb:
> > As you very well explain, gnome-main-menu also provides the libslab0
> > library, so gnome-main-menu can’t be just removed from testing to allow
> > for this transition to happen, since that would rende
13 matches
Mail list logo
