Planning a gcc-4.4 upload for unstable for next week. It's not a transition (not
changing any GCC defaults), but is likely to delay transitions of other packages
due to new symbols in the various GCC runtime libraries. For now I'm not aware
of any regressions in the runtime libraries, however build
Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Evgeny noticed that bug #517205 was also present in the stable package:
> xref.lisp was by mistake included in the upstream tarball.
>
> Luca proposed:
>> I would just repackage upstream as 20080223:
>> =
>> l...@gismo:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1:20080
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
Would it be OK to upload this to s-p-u?
>>> Yes, please upload.
>>
>> I have another one..:-)
>>
>> In #520794, a memory leak was reported when users use the full_audit
>> VFS module along with Samba.
>>
>> It was corre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
Evgeny noticed that bug #517205 was also present in the stable package:
xref.lisp was by mistake included in the upstream tarball.
Luca proposed:
> I would just repackage upstream as 20080223:
> =
> l...@gismo:~$ dpkg --compare-version
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
> >> Would it be OK to upload this to s-p-u?
> >
> > Yes, please upload.
>
>
> I have another one..:-)
>
> In #520794, a memory leak was reported when users use the full_audit
> VFS module along with Samba.
>
> It was corrected upstream in 3.2.8 w
>> Would it be OK to upload this to s-p-u?
>
> Yes, please upload.
I have another one..:-)
In #520794, a memory leak was reported when users use the full_audit
VFS module along with Samba.
It was corrected upstream in 3.2.8 with the attached patch.
One of the users affected by the bug reported
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 03:40:35PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> published for asterisk some time ago.
>
> CVE-2009-0041[0]:
> | IAX2 in Asterisk Open Source 1.2.x before 1.2.31, 1.4.x before
> | 1.4.23-rc4, and 1.6.x before 1.6.0.
+ Michael Biebl (Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:52:01 +0200):
> Hi,
> due to latest transitions in gtk, pango and gconf, a few of the NM related
> packages failed to build due to unmet b-deps. This should be fixed by now.
> Please give back:
> gb network-manager-openvpn_0.7.1-1 . mips
> gb network-manager-
+ Michael Biebl (Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:59:48 +0200):
> Hi,
Hello, Michael.
> please give back the following packages. Their build dependencies should
> be available by now:
> gb eiciel_0.9.6.1-3 . mipsel
> gb gnome-mount_0.8-2 . mipsel
No, the build-dependencies of these (libnautilus-extension-d
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:29:04AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> P.S. After boost-defaults is uploaded, the archive will have two
> source packages (boost, boost-defaults) that both produce the
> binary package libboost-dev. Won't that cause a problem? Does
> something need to be adjusted to a
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:52:13AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Moritz Muehlenhoff (Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:05:38 +0200):
>
> > Or maybe I'm misunderstanding you and uninstallable packages are removed
> > automatically from testing?
>
> On the contrary, it’s gtk1.2 and imlib that britney won’t rem
11 matches
Mail list logo