+ Sam Hartman (Mon, 04 May 2009 18:30:31 -0400):
> That was the goal, although I'm suspecting that reality will be a bit
> more difficult. Some symbols have had their versions increased in the
> 1.7 packages because new flags were added to the functionality. So,
> it's possible that if some of t
[moving debian-rele...@l.d.o to Bcc, continuing discussion in bug log]
also sprach Andreas Metzler [2009.05.04.1856
+0200]:
> FWIW as previously discussed on debian-devel starting with the
> lastest upload (4.69-10) exim4-daemon-light provides default-mta.
Excellent. If there are no objections,
Thanks for all your help!
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato Simó writes:
know when I've uploaded. However,
>> that should not stop you doing bin NMUs. As of
>> 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-9 (-13 is in unstable and testing) packages
>> built against libkrb5-dev will not depend on libkrb53. That
+ Yavor Doganov (Mon, 04 May 2009 23:34:53 +0300):
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > + Yavor Doganov (Mon, 04 May 2009 22:12:10 +0300):
> > > (Hubert, the gnustep-base powerpc issue is due to #523869, I believe.)
> > I gave it back a bit earlier, so as it seems it should succeed now.
> Unfortunately it
+ Norbert Preining (Mon, 04 May 2009 22:36:55 +0200):
> - current texlive-base in unstable is version 2007.dfsg.2-4
> - proposed update would be 2007.dsfg.2-1~lenny1
> So I guess the .orig.tar.gz should not be included in the upload as it
> is already present in the archive, right?
That's correc
Hi Luk,
On Mo, 04 Mai 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
> > texlive-base (2007.dfsg.2-1~lenny1) stable-proposed-updates;
>
> Please upload.
building packages. There is only one thing that I wanted to clarify:
- current texlive-base in unstable is version 2007.dfsg.2-4
- proposed update would be 2007.dsfg.
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Yavor Doganov (Mon, 04 May 2009 22:12:10 +0300):
> > (Hubert, the gnustep-base powerpc issue is due to #523869, I believe.)
>
> I gave it back a bit earlier, so as it seems it should succeed now.
Unfortunately it failed again because the fix for the above bug is in
gcc-4.
+ Sam Hartman (Mon, 04 May 2009 13:08:34 -0400):
> Adeodato> I say we go ahead without introducing an "oldlibs"
> Adeodato> package, and we Bin-NMU the affected packages. Then, if
> Adeodato> the transition gets very hairy, we'll migrate the new
> Adeodato> libraries to testing but
+ Yavor Doganov (Mon, 04 May 2009 22:12:10 +0300):
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > By the way, are gnustep-netclasses and pantomime1.2 in the same
> > situation popplerkit.framework used to be, that is, using GNUstep
> > libraries but not linking against them?
> Yes, they are, plus renaissance. Will
CVE-2008-2009 looks like a good candidate for an spu/ospu. Patches were
added to the unstable packages to harden against attacks similar to
this. It would be useful to have these patches in the stable releases to
provide added protection for users. See bug report [1] and mailing list
discussion [2
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> By the way, are gnustep-netclasses and pantomime1.2 in the same
> situation popplerkit.framework used to be, that is, using GNUstep
> libraries but not linking against them?
Yes, they are, plus renaissance. Will be fixed for the next
transition.
(Hubert, the gnustep-base p
+ Adeodato Simó (Mon, 04 May 2009 19:25:42 +0200):
> > Has new upstream version -- will upload shortly, no bin-NMU needed:
> > - gnustep-dl2
> > - gorm.app
> > - gworkspace
> > - price.app
> None of these scheduled.
Note, however, that not all the new GNUstep libraries are available on
hppa and
Adeodato> I say we go ahead without introducing an "oldlibs"
Adeodato> package, and we Bin-NMU the affected packages. Then, if
Adeodato> the transition gets very hairy, we'll migrate the new
Adeodato> libraries to testing but retaining libkrb53 there with
Adeodato> britney, as w
Norbert Preining wrote:
> I am proposing an update of texlive-base for lenny with the following
> changes:
>
> texlive-base (2007.dfsg.2-1~lenny1) stable-proposed-updates;
> urgency=medium
>
> * blacklist lamsarrow.sty (pb-diagram) as it is based on
> all-rights-reserved code. (Closes: #5
+ Hubert Chathi (Sat, 02 May 2009 20:32:22 -0400):
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:28:34 +0200 Adeodato Simó
> wrote:
> > The poppler transition is almost ready, and the popplerkit.framework
> > upload you made to fix the linkage issue has been built everywhere.
> > This means you can go forward with s
On 2009-05-04 Josselin Mouette wrote:
[...]
> The appropriate change would be to create a default-mta virtual package
> that is always provided by only one MTA at a time, so you might want to
> work on this solution instead of breaking important packages.
FWIW as previously discussed on debian-de
+ Josselin Mouette (Mon, 04 May 2009 18:15:01 +0200):
> Hi,
> glade-3 3.6 is now in unstable.
> Could you please schedule binNMUs for the reverse dependencies of
> libgladeui?
Bin-NMUs of anjuta, libgnomedb3 and libxfcegui4 scheduled, with
appropriate dep-waits on libgladeui-1-9.
Cheers,
--
+ Ansgar Burchardt (Sat, 02 May 2009 23:34:14 +0200):
> Hi,
> please add hints for enet/1.2-3 and blockattack/1.3.1-3 so they can
> migrate to testing.
Hint added, and thanks for mailing -- I'm sorry nobody was around on IRC
to answer you.
Cheers,
--
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
+ Steve M. Robbins (Sun, 03 May 2009 00:44:42 -0500):
> > I see you've uploaded boost-defaults already. In your previous mail, you
> > asked whether it was okay to upload already, or if we needed to wait
> > until the latest boost1.38 would migrate to testing.
> Um, yeah ... I was a bit impatient
Hi,
glade-3 3.6 is now in unstable.
Could you please schedule binNMUs for the reverse dependencies of
libgladeui?
Thanks,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
`- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
signature.asc
De
+ Mark Purcell (Sun, 03 May 2009 18:17:17 +1000):
> Dato,
> Thanks for the green light.
> Have now uploaded libexiv2-5 to unstable and (almost) installed on all archs.
> BinNMU's required for rdepends against the obsolete libexiv2-4:
Bin-NMUs scheduled. We have tools to calculate the list of pack
Dear Luk, dear release team,
(putting the maintainers of CTAN on Cc)
I am proposing an update of texlive-base for lenny with the following
changes:
texlive-base (2007.dfsg.2-1~lenny1) stable-proposed-updates;
urgency=medium
* blacklist lamsarrow.sty (pb-diagram) as it is based on
all-rig
On Montag, 4. Mai 2009, martin f krafft wrote:
> I will look into this; Holger just pointed it out to me.
#508644 - for those who wonder...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
also sprach Josselin Mouette [2009.05.04.1057 +0200]:
> > If exim4 is installed, then the alternative is never used. If
> > people don't like postfix being pulled in by mdadm, they can
> > choose another MTA, including exim4. This is an improvement over
> > the current situation, which might pull
Le lundi 04 mai 2009 à 10:15 +0200, martin f krafft a écrit :
> If exim4 is installed, then the alternative is never used. If people
> don't like postfix being pulled in by mdadm, they can choose
> another MTA, including exim4. This is an improvement over the
> current situation, which might pull i
also sprach Julien Cristau [2009.05.04.0932 +0200]:
> >* Provide an alternative (postfix) for mail-transport-agent
> >(closes: #522300). I chose postfix because that's the only
> >one I could recommend, and since the alternative does not
> >affect people who already have an MTA ins
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 07:15:44 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>* Provide an alternative (postfix) for mail-transport-agent (closes:
> #522300). I chose postfix because that's the only one I could recommend,
> and since the alternative does not affect people who already have an MTA
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
