On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:01:31AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, dann frazier said:
> > Are we still having random segfaults on paer? If so - that's be a good
> > one to resolve. Not sure if DSA would be willing to grant (heh) you
> > access to that box, or if we should
This one time, at band camp, dann frazier said:
> Are we still having random segfaults on paer? If so - that's be a good
> one to resolve. Not sure if DSA would be willing to grant (heh) you
> access to that box, or if we should try running a dummy buildd on
> another rp2470.
We're running paer on
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 02:50:27PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:25:31AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> ...
> > > BTW, that firewall was reviewed and approved by Lamont (a pretty well
> > > known DD and buildd maintainer).
> > >
> > > Thibaut Varene (who is a DD) has of
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:25:31AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
...
> > BTW, that firewall was reviewed and approved by Lamont (a pretty well
> > known DD and buildd maintainer).
> >
> > Thibaut Varene (who is a DD) has offered to host HPPA buildd machines
> > as well but hasn't heard any response
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:05:29PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > In the meantime, it's uninstallable (see #533216).
> >
> > Any ideas on how can this be fixed? Maybe a gnote upload to tpu?
>
> That would indeed be an option.
Okay, gnote_0.4.0-3~squeeze1 uploaded to tpu. Please consider unblockin
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:10 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:00 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
> >> reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in t
On 06/16/2009 08:25 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 15/06/09 at 11:31 -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
PS: if you want an HPPA-specific issue to play with,
http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=ruby1.9&ver=1.9.0.1-5&arch=hppa&stamp=1213563978&file=log&as=raw
might be a good candidate.
In reali
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 09:08:37PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 06/16/2009 08:25 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> On 15/06/09 at 11:31 -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
>> PS: if you want an HPPA-specific issue to play with,
>> http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=ruby1.9&ver=1.9.0.1-5&arch=hppa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:19:44PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I hope Jonas Smedegaard is around and watching :-)
Huh - am I allowed to watch only?!?
>As you will see in BTS #449973, upstream states:
>
>> without some GUI dialog implementa
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:00 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
>> reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in the
>> shared lib package name of 1.3-2).
>
> From what I can se
Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I might have missed something (I'm not familiar with this new "Breaks" field)
> but it seems to me that libxml++2.6 2.26.0-2 shouldn't have migrated to
> testing untill gnote (<< 0.4) had been superceded:
>
> libxml++2.6 (2.26.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Mar
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope Jonas Smedegaard is around and watching :-)
>
> As you will see in BTS #449973, upstream states:
>
>> without some GUI dialog implementation, it's nearly useless. so other
>> than sentimental attachment, i don't see much point for it to remain in
>> debian...
>
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Pascal,
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Pascal
> Vandeputte wrote:
> [...]
>> # ls -al initrd-{amd64,i386}/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 pvdputte pvdputte 4148 2009-06-16 10:42
>> initrd-amd64/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 pvdpu
Mathieu Parent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Mathieu Parent wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> kolabd and libkolab-perl are not entering testing whereas the 10-days
>>> delay is over and no dependency is missing.
>>>
>>> This probably comes from kolabconf which has bee
Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> Hi. Thanks for all your help with the binary NMUs and for analyzing
> my plans and giving suggestions.
Hi Sam
> I'm assuming there are some complications I don't know about it as
> debian-release currently has a block on krb5.
I guess that's only because it's not ready t
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:03:11PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> libbtctl
> >> gnome-vfs-obexftp
> >
> > shall be removed, will file bugs
> >
> > what's the best way to proceed?
>
> binNMUs scheduled.
>
> Best way is to track the binNMUs and the packages that need an updated
> build dependen
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:00 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
> reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in the
> shared lib package name of 1.3-2).
From what I can see, it looks like there are at leas
Hi,
I hope Jonas Smedegaard is around and watching :-)
As you will see in BTS #449973, upstream states:
> without some GUI dialog implementation, it's nearly useless. so other
> than sentimental attachment, i don't see much point for it to remain in
> debian...
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Hello Pascal,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Pascal
Vandeputte wrote:
[...]
> # ls -al initrd-{amd64,i386}/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pvdputte pvdputte 4148 2009-06-16 10:42
> initrd-amd64/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pvdputte pvdputte 5801 2009-06-16 10:42
>
Hi,
I might have missed something (I'm not familiar with this new "Breaks" field)
but it seems to me that libxml++2.6 2.26.0-2 shouldn't have migrated to
testing untill gnote (<< 0.4) had been superceded:
libxml++2.6 (2.26.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Mark libxml++2.6-2 Breaks: gnote (<< 0.4)
20 matches
Mail list logo
